July 19, 2011
I’ve noticed that charter schools have been getting used as code a lot by those who are promoting child molestation. It seems to me that it’s the regular public school system that’s going to be the most affected by things such as the STEM program, through which President Obama is going to sell the nation’s children to media corporations and other corporations and turn children into sexual prey for teachers and everyone else.
I suppose that charter schools that are started and supported by corporations that want child molestation to become socially acceptable and legal, such as Goldman Sachs, are more likely than other charter schools to endorse child molestation, but it seems to me that the use of stories about charter schools by those who are in support of child sexual abuse is something that’s being done to deflect attention away from the fact that the entire public school system is going to be affected.
Placing blame on those who have sought alternatives to tradition while you try figure out how to deflect blame for yourselves and continue to pursue your hideous agenda; that’s a standard tactic for a corrupt establishment to use, isn’t it?
It also seems to me that charter schools, which are alternative schools and which seem to rely on grants, will in fact be very vulnerable to being forced to accept funding by coporations with bad agendas. If the government says "Charter schools can't get grants to exist anymore, and they have to find funding elsewhere," then that will put the charter school movement at the mercy of the private interests that want to abuse children and that will pay to get the chance further that agenda.
Those are also companies that can be powerful lobbyists, so, as this situation gains momentum, people in Congress will feel increasing pressure to make compromises and finally to give in altogether.
The next step after that will be legalization of all child abuse, I guess. Once the people who write and pass the laws feel that they can't say "no" to the companies that put them in office, no matter what those companies want to do, they're going to sign off on it all.
It's really sad, because it looks as if charter schools were started in order to give children better educations, smaller classes, brighter teachers who aren't burnt out and who really want to help kids learn. That those schools are both being used as code and implicated as the worst culprits and that they will actually possibly be the first to become owned by companies whose goal is to exploit children; this whole story gets worse every day.
Copyright L. Kochman July 19, 2011 @ 11:58 a.m./addition @ 12:00 p.m./addition @ 12:01 p.m./addition @ 12:05 p.m.
I’ve noticed that charter schools have been getting used as code a lot by those who are promoting child molestation. It seems to me that it’s the regular public school system that’s going to be the most affected by things such as the STEM program, through which President Obama is going to sell the nation’s children to media corporations and other corporations and turn children into sexual prey for teachers and everyone else.
I suppose that charter schools that are started and supported by corporations that want child molestation to become socially acceptable and legal, such as Goldman Sachs, are more likely than other charter schools to endorse child molestation, but it seems to me that the use of stories about charter schools by those who are in support of child sexual abuse is something that’s being done to deflect attention away from the fact that the entire public school system is going to be affected.
Placing blame on those who have sought alternatives to tradition while you try figure out how to deflect blame for yourselves and continue to pursue your hideous agenda; that’s a standard tactic for a corrupt establishment to use, isn’t it?
It also seems to me that charter schools, which are alternative schools and which seem to rely on grants, will in fact be very vulnerable to being forced to accept funding by coporations with bad agendas. If the government says "Charter schools can't get grants to exist anymore, and they have to find funding elsewhere," then that will put the charter school movement at the mercy of the private interests that want to abuse children and that will pay to get the chance further that agenda.
Those are also companies that can be powerful lobbyists, so, as this situation gains momentum, people in Congress will feel increasing pressure to make compromises and finally to give in altogether.
The next step after that will be legalization of all child abuse, I guess. Once the people who write and pass the laws feel that they can't say "no" to the companies that put them in office, no matter what those companies want to do, they're going to sign off on it all.
It's really sad, because it looks as if charter schools were started in order to give children better educations, smaller classes, brighter teachers who aren't burnt out and who really want to help kids learn. That those schools are both being used as code and implicated as the worst culprits and that they will actually possibly be the first to become owned by companies whose goal is to exploit children; this whole story gets worse every day.
Copyright L. Kochman July 19, 2011 @ 11:58 a.m./addition @ 12:00 p.m./addition @ 12:01 p.m./addition @ 12:05 p.m.