THERE IS NO CODE INTENDED BY ME ON THIS PAGE.
April 28, 2011
--My impression of yesterday's Boston Globe was that it was trying to imply that the indicated people were endorsing pedophilia. It doesn't mean that what the newspaper was implying is true, and I didn't mean to say that it is true.
I have seen other newspapers do that; they try to make it seem as if they have support from prominent people for the awful things that the newspapers want to do.
That's what I was trying to illuminate yesterday.
--I opened today's Times Argus to fin:
--a flier from Home Depot that had an ad in the top right hand corner for a drill that said:
"new! Milwaukee REDLithium Advantage
See page 13 for more details"
--to the left of that is the back of the "Christmas Tree Shop" flier, advertising for "Dehumidifiers" in addition to miniature "Solar Lighthouses" and "Beach Towels in hoods" for kids, showing 2 young children in hooded beach towels. One of the kids was in a beach towel with a lobster design, the other in a beach towl with a shark design
--Then there was a large magazine for "Berlin City Auto Group" proclaiming:
"WE DID IT AGAIN:
President's Award Winner"
against a red background.
On page B1, the article at the top of the page says:
"Early Education Bill Draws Fire"
and below that there's an article entitled:
"Flooding closes roads, school in Duxbury"
I wonder what right the Times Argus, or any other pedophile has, to call me dirty.
--Something that children and teenagers who are following this story might not realize is that the adults who want to make pedophilia first socially acceptable and then legal have nothing to do with appropriate sex education. The behavior of those adults has to do with them wanting to turn children into sex objects FOR ADULTS. It's an important distinction.
Copyright L. Kochman April 28, 2011 @ 2:12 p.m.
(May 2, 2011 I have removed some of what I originally wrote here. L. Kochman)
April 28, 2011
--My impression of yesterday's Boston Globe was that it was trying to imply that the indicated people were endorsing pedophilia. It doesn't mean that what the newspaper was implying is true, and I didn't mean to say that it is true.
I have seen other newspapers do that; they try to make it seem as if they have support from prominent people for the awful things that the newspapers want to do.
That's what I was trying to illuminate yesterday.
--I opened today's Times Argus to fin:
--a flier from Home Depot that had an ad in the top right hand corner for a drill that said:
"new! Milwaukee REDLithium Advantage
See page 13 for more details"
--to the left of that is the back of the "Christmas Tree Shop" flier, advertising for "Dehumidifiers" in addition to miniature "Solar Lighthouses" and "Beach Towels in hoods" for kids, showing 2 young children in hooded beach towels. One of the kids was in a beach towel with a lobster design, the other in a beach towl with a shark design
--Then there was a large magazine for "Berlin City Auto Group" proclaiming:
"WE DID IT AGAIN:
President's Award Winner"
against a red background.
On page B1, the article at the top of the page says:
"Early Education Bill Draws Fire"
and below that there's an article entitled:
"Flooding closes roads, school in Duxbury"
I wonder what right the Times Argus, or any other pedophile has, to call me dirty.
--Something that children and teenagers who are following this story might not realize is that the adults who want to make pedophilia first socially acceptable and then legal have nothing to do with appropriate sex education. The behavior of those adults has to do with them wanting to turn children into sex objects FOR ADULTS. It's an important distinction.
Copyright L. Kochman April 28, 2011 @ 2:12 p.m.
(May 2, 2011 I have removed some of what I originally wrote here. L. Kochman)