This is something I started to write on October 30, 2010 but haven't published anywhere before today.
--President Barack Obama Still Supporting Brian Williams With Marlene Targ Brill Google post, Marlene Targ Brill websites, Brian Williams NBC Nightly News, Making A Difference Unicef and Children, Unicef harasses with Floods in Pakistan, Unicef and NBA Cares, Unicef Campus Initiative, United Nations website harasses with Floods in Pakistan, Ever heard of the monsoon season?
--President Obama mocks victims of rape
Here’s the blog post that Barack Obama has shown on a Google search of his name for months, in support of NBC’s Brian Williams and Mr. Williams’s fraud regarding his “Making A Difference” project. By the way; I would appreciate it if everyone who is still showing support for Mr. Williams who hasn't read my blog page on Weebly about Mr. Williams's fraud would do that. Those people have no right to decide that I'm not telling the truth about what Mr. Williams did if they haven't taken the time to read about my own discovery of the extensive fraud that Mr. Williams committed to make it look as if "Making A Difference" was his idea. It was NOT his idea, and he went far out of his way to lie about it, which he never had to do, and now he's devoted his life to attempting to abuse and discredit me, and he never had to do that, either.
--President Barack Obama Still Supporting Brian Williams With Marlene Targ Brill Google post, Marlene Targ Brill websites, Brian Williams NBC Nightly News, Making A Difference Unicef and Children, Unicef harasses with Floods in Pakistan, Unicef and NBA Cares, Unicef Campus Initiative, United Nations website harasses with Floods in Pakistan, Ever heard of the monsoon season?
--President Obama mocks victims of rape
Here’s the blog post that Barack Obama has shown on a Google search of his name for months, in support of NBC’s Brian Williams and Mr. Williams’s fraud regarding his “Making A Difference” project. By the way; I would appreciate it if everyone who is still showing support for Mr. Williams who hasn't read my blog page on Weebly about Mr. Williams's fraud would do that. Those people have no right to decide that I'm not telling the truth about what Mr. Williams did if they haven't taken the time to read about my own discovery of the extensive fraud that Mr. Williams committed to make it look as if "Making A Difference" was his idea. It was NOT his idea, and he went far out of his way to lie about it, which he never had to do, and now he's devoted his life to attempting to abuse and discredit me, and he never had to do that, either.
Here are the first two websites that show up on a Google search of the name Marlene Targ Brill. I’ve believed for a long time that, in addition to showing support for Brian Williams, sexual harassment from President Obama in particular is what is meant by Mr. Obama’s display of the name “Marlene Targ Brill.” “Brill” is a type of fish, and also the websites that supposedly belong to Marlene Targ Brill have always looked as if they were created to be part of the harassment and have been threatening the entire time that they’ve existed.
It has always seemed to me that the name “Marlene Targ Brill” has been used as White House code for “Target Lena The Fish;” it's a vagina reference, and also threatening.
I'm having difficulty putting captions on the pictures tonight. If you go through these slides, you'll see that the websites for "Marlene Targ Brill" are full of harassing references, and also allusions to the fact that I worked in a pharmacy for a couple of years. However, I always thought that the most threatening statement was the one that I've shown in the last slide. It's in the paragraph from the section of that website that says "Most Traumatic Event In Childhood," and it says "Actually, there were too many events to recount. But my kindergarten year stands out. My kindergarten teacher didn't like us to talk. So she put tape over our mouths and bags over our heads when we chatted with classmates. Luckily, I never got caught. But one time she punished the entire class for becoming too noisy before going home. She put us in the cloak closet and closed the door! Glad school is different today--I hope."
It has always seemed to me that the name “Marlene Targ Brill” has been used as White House code for “Target Lena The Fish;” it's a vagina reference, and also threatening.
I'm having difficulty putting captions on the pictures tonight. If you go through these slides, you'll see that the websites for "Marlene Targ Brill" are full of harassing references, and also allusions to the fact that I worked in a pharmacy for a couple of years. However, I always thought that the most threatening statement was the one that I've shown in the last slide. It's in the paragraph from the section of that website that says "Most Traumatic Event In Childhood," and it says "Actually, there were too many events to recount. But my kindergarten year stands out. My kindergarten teacher didn't like us to talk. So she put tape over our mouths and bags over our heads when we chatted with classmates. Luckily, I never got caught. But one time she punished the entire class for becoming too noisy before going home. She put us in the cloak closet and closed the door! Glad school is different today--I hope."
These websites for “Marlene Targ Brill” have been just the way I’ve shown them here since I first saw them on the Internet during the summer of 2010. To me, they have always seemed not only harassing and threatening to physical safety but also an unapologetic declaration by the U.S. government about what the government now seems to feel is its right to censor people. One blog and Internet presence of mine another have been censored more than once since this past summer, since the government got involved in harassing me.
Here’s what the website for Brian Williams’s NBC Nightly News looked like on the night of October 30, 2010:
Here’s what the website for Brian Williams’s NBC Nightly News looked like on the night of October 30, 2010:
Mr. Williams’s “Making A Difference” section on October 30, 2010 was about children and Unicef. Unicef is the United Nations Children’s Fund. Following the links to Unicef from the “Making A Difference” section on Mr. Williams’s Nightly News website, I saw that the main page of the Unicef website was taken up with “Floods in Pakistan.”
It seems as if Toys R Us and HGTV are both supporters of the harassment and I guess also the pedophilia.
It seems as if Toys R Us and HGTV are both supporters of the harassment and I guess also the pedophilia.
Along the side of the first page of the Unicef website on October 30, 2010 it also said “NBA Cares.” It is obvious from the NBA Cares page on Unicef, which shows a man wearing a shirt that says “Sea John,” that the NBA is and has been a major part of the harassment of me for a long time.
Tonight, which is now November 4, 2010 @ 1:41 a.m., I looked at the NBA website, and went from there to the “NBA Cares” website. The NBA Cares website has devoted itself to the pedophilia side of the harassment.
I’m curious as to how the NBA justifies doing that; it’s one thing to say that you’re not a role model and then to act as if you’re not a role model. It’s something else altogether to publicize yourself as a role model for children and for people who take care of children and then to make that publicity into a joke in support of sexual harassment and pedophilia.
Here's another picture that I took of a page on the Unicef website on October 30, 2010; the website showed a picture of a little girl standing in water with a title that said "Support UNICEF'S flood disaster relief for the children of Pakistan."
I’m curious as to how the NBA justifies doing that; it’s one thing to say that you’re not a role model and then to act as if you’re not a role model. It’s something else altogether to publicize yourself as a role model for children and for people who take care of children and then to make that publicity into a joke in support of sexual harassment and pedophilia.
Here's another picture that I took of a page on the Unicef website on October 30, 2010; the website showed a picture of a little girl standing in water with a title that said "Support UNICEF'S flood disaster relief for the children of Pakistan."
On October 30, 2010, the website for the United Nations still had “Floods in Pakistan” on its first page:
“Floods in Pakistan” is a story that Hillary Clinton made up and contributed to the harassment of me when I refused to help her slander Barack Obama. I refused to say anything negative about President Obama beyond saying that I didn’t want him to continue to endorse harassment of me.
My WordPress blog was destroyed quite a while ago, but here’s what I originally wrote on WordPress in August about the “Floods in Pakistan” story being used as harassment of me:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
August 25, 2010
“Flood relief trickles out, cautiously, from Pakistanis in US (Feature)
By Anindita Ramaswamy Aug 25, 2010, 1:42 GMT
// Washington – As Pakistan’s flood waters surge forward like a slow-motion tsunami, Pakistani-Americans are responding – hesitantly and cautiously – in what appears to be a sluggish build up to meeting the immense needs of their home country.
Mohammad Razvi, co-founder of the Council of Peoples Organization (COPO) in Brooklyn, New York, goes to great lengths each day reassuring community members their donations will be channeled directly to the flood victims, without any intervention from the Pakistan government.”
——————————————————————-
August 25, 2010 @ 5:15 p.m.
Above is an excerpt from the second, current Google search result on the term “Pakistan Floods 2010.” The article goes on to say this:
“Charity Navigator, a New Jersey-based organization that evaluates non-profits, outlines a few reasons for the apathetic charitable reaction to the floods. Apart from Haiti, donors also responded to the February earthquake in Chile and the oil spill along the US Gulf Coast in April.”
New Jersey….Haiti….the Gulf Coast oil spill….this is all sounding very familiar.
I am looking at an Encyclopedia Brittanica from 1958. It’s one of the many books that live here. Here’s one of the things it says under the entry marked “MONSOON:”
“In India the term “monsoon” is specially used for the rain which falls during June to September…”
If Pakistani Americans don’t want to send money to Pakistan for the “Pakistan flood disaster,” it might be because Pakistan and India have been flooding every summer since the dawn of time.
Here are the two seemingly most current Google search results on the term “Pakistan Floods 2010,” the second of which I’ve just discussed. The line that strikes me the most from the full website for that second search result is “Mohammad Razvi, co-founder of the Council of Peoples Organization (COPO) in Brooklyn, New York, goes to great lengths each day reassuring community members their donations will be channeled directly to the flood victims, without any intervention from the Pakistan government.”
Interesting….a charity organization that doesn’t want to deal with the government of the country which the funds that the charity is taking from people are supposedly going to help. How clean IS clean? Does the word “laundering” fit in here, do you suppose?
1. News for pakistan floods 2010
Kansas City Star
§ US Provides $50 Million in Early Recovery Aid to Pakistan Flood … – 3 hours ago
Islamabad, August 25, 2010 – Dr. Rajiv Shah, Administrator of the US Agency for … the people of Pakistan in the aftermath of the country’s flood disaster. …
USAID (press release) – 734 related articles »
§ Flood relief trickles out, cautiously, from Pakistanis in US (Feature) – Monsters and Critics.com – 2042 related articles »
August 28, 2010
As I’ve said many times, I’m not going to object to any legitimate work that gets done on humanitarian and other important world issues. It may be that Pakistan is experiencing an especially bad monsoon season, but I think it’s likely that there have been many bad monsoon seasons in that part of the world since the United States has been in existence and that neither Pakistan nor India received $50 million from the U.S. government during those years.
Prevention of climate change is also important, as is work to eliminate racial discrimination; these are all worthy goals. My protests have been about the use of the publicity of those goals as weapons.
I must be the target of one of the most expensive conspiracies that there have ever been that focused on just one person.
BP is going to pay $20 billion dollars as a result of the fact that the media made an around the clock, months-long joke out of the BP oil spill as a metaphor for my vagina and never stopped screaming about how dangerous the oil spill was, how it was the “worst environmental disaster in history!” The CEO for BP lost his job and now there are millions of people who think that BP is an especially horrible company that doesn’t deserve to survive.
The U.S. Government is going to give $50 million dollars to “Pakistan flood relief.” Those are $50 million dollars that AREN’T going to be spent on anything that helps Americans in the United States. Taxpayer money; another casualty of the “let’s call Lena dirty, disgusting and dangerous” campaign.
—————————————————————————————————————————-
August 28, 2010 @ 3:40 p.m.
I just did a Google search on the term “50 million Pakistan.” The first result that came up says “US flood relief to Pakistan touches 200 million.” Here’s that search result, which claims that monetary aid to Pakistan has now reached $200 million:
Search Results
1. News for 50 million Pakistan
CBC.ca
§ US flood relief assistance to Pakistan touches 200 million – 1 day ago
PTI US flood relief assistance to Pakistan has touched USD 200 million figure, after USAID Administrator Rajiv Shah announced diverting of USD 50 million …
The Hindu – 3462 related articles »
————————————————————————————————————————–
Here are the first two paragraphs of the article from the website for “US flood relief assistance to Pakistan touches 200 million:”
U.S. flood relief assistance to Pakistan touches 200 million
U.S. flood relief assistance to Pakistan has touched USD 200 million figure, after USAID Administrator Rajiv Shah announced diverting of USD 50 million from its long-term aid package to the country.
This USD 50 million latest block is money that will be redirected from other priorities under Kerry-Lugar-Berman, including pre-positioning of supplies in Pakistan to be able to more effectively assist the people of Pakistan when the flood waters begin to recede,” State Department spokesman, P. J. Crowley, said adding that U.S. will be re-evaluating its projects.
—————————————————————————————————————————-
August 28, 2010 @ 3:46 p.m.
The wording of the second paragraph in the above article is awkward, but it seems to be saying that $50 million U.S. Dollars are going to be used for “pre-positioning of supplies in Pakistan to be able to more effectively assist the people of Pakistan when the flood waters begin to recede.”
In other words, $50 million dollars are being used to buy stuff and put it somewhere; those $50 million dollars aren’t actually getting used to help anybody right now. According to that article, that money isn’t even getting used to help Pakistanis.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
November 4, 2010 @ 2:20 a.m.
--Barack Obama mocks rape
Here’s a blog post that appeared on a Google search of the name Barack Obama on October 30, 2010:
My WordPress blog was destroyed quite a while ago, but here’s what I originally wrote on WordPress in August about the “Floods in Pakistan” story being used as harassment of me:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
August 25, 2010
“Flood relief trickles out, cautiously, from Pakistanis in US (Feature)
By Anindita Ramaswamy Aug 25, 2010, 1:42 GMT
// Washington – As Pakistan’s flood waters surge forward like a slow-motion tsunami, Pakistani-Americans are responding – hesitantly and cautiously – in what appears to be a sluggish build up to meeting the immense needs of their home country.
Mohammad Razvi, co-founder of the Council of Peoples Organization (COPO) in Brooklyn, New York, goes to great lengths each day reassuring community members their donations will be channeled directly to the flood victims, without any intervention from the Pakistan government.”
——————————————————————-
August 25, 2010 @ 5:15 p.m.
Above is an excerpt from the second, current Google search result on the term “Pakistan Floods 2010.” The article goes on to say this:
“Charity Navigator, a New Jersey-based organization that evaluates non-profits, outlines a few reasons for the apathetic charitable reaction to the floods. Apart from Haiti, donors also responded to the February earthquake in Chile and the oil spill along the US Gulf Coast in April.”
New Jersey….Haiti….the Gulf Coast oil spill….this is all sounding very familiar.
I am looking at an Encyclopedia Brittanica from 1958. It’s one of the many books that live here. Here’s one of the things it says under the entry marked “MONSOON:”
“In India the term “monsoon” is specially used for the rain which falls during June to September…”
If Pakistani Americans don’t want to send money to Pakistan for the “Pakistan flood disaster,” it might be because Pakistan and India have been flooding every summer since the dawn of time.
Here are the two seemingly most current Google search results on the term “Pakistan Floods 2010,” the second of which I’ve just discussed. The line that strikes me the most from the full website for that second search result is “Mohammad Razvi, co-founder of the Council of Peoples Organization (COPO) in Brooklyn, New York, goes to great lengths each day reassuring community members their donations will be channeled directly to the flood victims, without any intervention from the Pakistan government.”
Interesting….a charity organization that doesn’t want to deal with the government of the country which the funds that the charity is taking from people are supposedly going to help. How clean IS clean? Does the word “laundering” fit in here, do you suppose?
1. News for pakistan floods 2010
Kansas City Star
§ US Provides $50 Million in Early Recovery Aid to Pakistan Flood … – 3 hours ago
Islamabad, August 25, 2010 – Dr. Rajiv Shah, Administrator of the US Agency for … the people of Pakistan in the aftermath of the country’s flood disaster. …
USAID (press release) – 734 related articles »
§ Flood relief trickles out, cautiously, from Pakistanis in US (Feature) – Monsters and Critics.com – 2042 related articles »
August 28, 2010
As I’ve said many times, I’m not going to object to any legitimate work that gets done on humanitarian and other important world issues. It may be that Pakistan is experiencing an especially bad monsoon season, but I think it’s likely that there have been many bad monsoon seasons in that part of the world since the United States has been in existence and that neither Pakistan nor India received $50 million from the U.S. government during those years.
Prevention of climate change is also important, as is work to eliminate racial discrimination; these are all worthy goals. My protests have been about the use of the publicity of those goals as weapons.
I must be the target of one of the most expensive conspiracies that there have ever been that focused on just one person.
BP is going to pay $20 billion dollars as a result of the fact that the media made an around the clock, months-long joke out of the BP oil spill as a metaphor for my vagina and never stopped screaming about how dangerous the oil spill was, how it was the “worst environmental disaster in history!” The CEO for BP lost his job and now there are millions of people who think that BP is an especially horrible company that doesn’t deserve to survive.
The U.S. Government is going to give $50 million dollars to “Pakistan flood relief.” Those are $50 million dollars that AREN’T going to be spent on anything that helps Americans in the United States. Taxpayer money; another casualty of the “let’s call Lena dirty, disgusting and dangerous” campaign.
—————————————————————————————————————————-
August 28, 2010 @ 3:40 p.m.
I just did a Google search on the term “50 million Pakistan.” The first result that came up says “US flood relief to Pakistan touches 200 million.” Here’s that search result, which claims that monetary aid to Pakistan has now reached $200 million:
Search Results
1. News for 50 million Pakistan
CBC.ca
§ US flood relief assistance to Pakistan touches 200 million – 1 day ago
PTI US flood relief assistance to Pakistan has touched USD 200 million figure, after USAID Administrator Rajiv Shah announced diverting of USD 50 million …
The Hindu – 3462 related articles »
————————————————————————————————————————–
Here are the first two paragraphs of the article from the website for “US flood relief assistance to Pakistan touches 200 million:”
U.S. flood relief assistance to Pakistan touches 200 million
U.S. flood relief assistance to Pakistan has touched USD 200 million figure, after USAID Administrator Rajiv Shah announced diverting of USD 50 million from its long-term aid package to the country.
This USD 50 million latest block is money that will be redirected from other priorities under Kerry-Lugar-Berman, including pre-positioning of supplies in Pakistan to be able to more effectively assist the people of Pakistan when the flood waters begin to recede,” State Department spokesman, P. J. Crowley, said adding that U.S. will be re-evaluating its projects.
—————————————————————————————————————————-
August 28, 2010 @ 3:46 p.m.
The wording of the second paragraph in the above article is awkward, but it seems to be saying that $50 million U.S. Dollars are going to be used for “pre-positioning of supplies in Pakistan to be able to more effectively assist the people of Pakistan when the flood waters begin to recede.”
In other words, $50 million dollars are being used to buy stuff and put it somewhere; those $50 million dollars aren’t actually getting used to help anybody right now. According to that article, that money isn’t even getting used to help Pakistanis.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
November 4, 2010 @ 2:20 a.m.
--Barack Obama mocks rape
Here’s a blog post that appeared on a Google search of the name Barack Obama on October 30, 2010:
November 4, 2010 @ 10:30 p.m.
I have a few things that I planned to do tonight, one of which is to finish putting up pictures of Mr. Obama’s website in which he made a sick joke out of rape.
Before I do that, I wanted to talk about something that happened not too long ago. When I was taking pictures of Old Navy’s “Price Cleanser” signs on October 18, 2010, a female employee walked out of the store and acted as if she didn’t know why I was there or why I was taking pictures. My impression of her was that she knew exactly who I was and why I was taking pictures, and that she wanted to antagonize me.
The “Cleanser” signs were removed and replaced with inoffensive signs after I’d put up pictures of them on my blog page called “Corporate Harassment,” but tonight the sign inside the store says “Jersey Turtlenecks.”
That woman’s behavior is an example of someone who is using my situation as an excuse to take out her pettiness and her unhappiness with her own life on me. I’d never met her before; I’d never seen her before.
Her trying to upset me has nothing to do with me, has nothing to do with anything I’ve done and isn’t something I deserve; it’s something that she wouldn’t even have thought of doing if the government hadn’t been endorsing bullying.
What the Obama administration is doing to the country is almost indescribably destructive.
I have a few things that I planned to do tonight, one of which is to finish putting up pictures of Mr. Obama’s website in which he made a sick joke out of rape.
Before I do that, I wanted to talk about something that happened not too long ago. When I was taking pictures of Old Navy’s “Price Cleanser” signs on October 18, 2010, a female employee walked out of the store and acted as if she didn’t know why I was there or why I was taking pictures. My impression of her was that she knew exactly who I was and why I was taking pictures, and that she wanted to antagonize me.
The “Cleanser” signs were removed and replaced with inoffensive signs after I’d put up pictures of them on my blog page called “Corporate Harassment,” but tonight the sign inside the store says “Jersey Turtlenecks.”
That woman’s behavior is an example of someone who is using my situation as an excuse to take out her pettiness and her unhappiness with her own life on me. I’d never met her before; I’d never seen her before.
Her trying to upset me has nothing to do with me, has nothing to do with anything I’ve done and isn’t something I deserve; it’s something that she wouldn’t even have thought of doing if the government hadn’t been endorsing bullying.
What the Obama administration is doing to the country is almost indescribably destructive.