THERE IS NO CODE INTENDED BY ME ON THIS PAGE.
May 23, 2011
--Food Stamps purchases
My unhappy and indignant assumption is that my food stamps purchases are still being illegally tracked by a lot of people. Most of the time, I have refused to clarify my purchases, because nobody should be invading my privacy that way; however, some situations are so bad that I think I should address them.
Yesterday, I bought a diet Red Raspberry iced tea. It was a warm day and that was what I wanted. It doesn't mean that I've changed my mind about any of the issues.
--Clarification about Iran and other issues
I wrote a note in my blog page from May 21, 2011 about my concerns that one of the reasons that the deaths or continued jailings in Iran are still being pushed by some people is to try to damage my future writing career by putting me under a moral obligation not to work with anyone who showed support for those deaths with ads and clothing color choices and so on.
What I meant was "even if those people change their minds." My impression is that a lot of people who didn't and still don't understand the real, political issues about Iran got involved in promoting those deaths and continued jailings as a joke; a sick, irresponsible joke. That's my feeling about all of the issues I've talked about; at a certain point, you just have to give up on people and their inability or refusal to be responsible.
There's always a lot more going on than I have time to write about. I get harassed in person every day, several times a day, and I do think that it's affecting my mental abilities. Yesterday and the day before were terrible; I had pairs or groups of men harassing me in situations that are supposed to be safe; then they yelled at me when I objected to their behavior, told me that they weren't doing anything wrong, told me I was crazy and that I needed to shut up or leave places where I really had every right to be. They are people who don't let up unless an authority makes them stop. It's always the worst of the worst who do it, and I never provoke it; they are always the ones who start it with their deliberate, harassing comments.
It's not as if I'm reading something that isn't there into casual comments that people make; they will sit or stand near me and have fake conversations about fish and all the other things that have been used as harassment. They know what the larger situation is; maybe some of them read my blog. I don't think that all of the people who do it can be reading my blog, though; I think at least some of them have to be just going by what's in newspapers such as the Times Argus.
The pattern tends to be that they have these fake conversations or make comments, laughing, and then, when I object, they pretend that they have no idea what I'm talking about. Some people do back off, but the past couple of days have been disturbing in how quickly and viciously the men involved ganged up and shouted at me. They seem to be really liking the idea of the United States getting turned into a police state run by men, with women and children subservient to those men.
--South Burlington High School
I just took a look at the website for South Burlington High School. That school is completely overtaken by corrupt administrators; one thing on it is an announcement saying "Congratulations to (the SBHS student) for receiving a "Congressional Choice" Award for his fabulous landscape titled "Seaside Serenity."
There's a picture of the winning art project; it's a picture of water surrounded by rocks.
Obviously, that student created his art project in order to win the contest by making his entire project about sexual harassment of women and the potential executions of the prisoners in Iran. What's worse is that he succeeded; how many other, more worthy projects didn't get any attention?
I just looked up "2011 Congressional Art Exhibition Montpelier VT" and saw on the website for the T.W. Wood Gallery that "winning work (is) to be shown in the National Capitol for a year."
One of my Friendster profiles shows pictures of Patrick Leahy's website from a time after I'd been talking for a few months about pedophilia and other abuses as endorsed by the federal government and enforced with intimidation by the military and the police departments. I thought it was ironic at the time that there was also a main story featured on Senator Leahy's website called "The Fair Sentencing Act Is Signed Into Law" that also has a picture of Senator Leahy shaking hands with President Obama. Now, I think that picture and story are even more ironic.
Here are some of the captions along the side of Senator Leahy's website from that day, starting with October 1, 2010. I think the dates listed in the website must be when the captions first appeared on that website. The first two are:
"Leahy: $31.5 million Army Contract Addition Will Further Extend Goodrich-Vergennes Plant's work on Helicopter Diagnostics Units, October 1, 2010"
"Leahy: 22 VT Police Depts. win bulletproof vest grants, October 1, 2010"
There are more captions, written here in the order in which they appeared on Senator Leahy's website:
"Leahy: 3 Vermont Communities Receive Grants for Police Hiring, September 30, 2010"
"Senate Recesses Without Confirming Judicial Nominees, September 30, 2010"
"Leahy-Authored Bill to Improve Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act Set To Become Law, September 30, 2010"
"Leahy: $200,000 grant will continue key outreach efforts for Vermont's Runaway and Homeless Youth, September 29, 2010"
This morning, I started reading my blog from its first page, entitled "Brian Williams at NBC is a fraud." That blog page originally had a very long section describing the months-long efforts of Brian Williams and other news shows to make daily coverage of the BP oil spill a metaphor for my supposedly hazardously wet and unclean vagina. The NBC Nightly News show used the term "kill the well" a lot, and also on at least one occasion used terms such as "final solution" and "permanent solution" and that was echoed by President Obama in his online video about "killing the well" and finding "a final solution."
I took out most of that section of that blog page in the fall of 2010. The discussion starts again on September 24, 2010, at a time when I'd walked out of my parents' house in the middle of them yelling at me for my efforts to document what had been happening in the newspapers and the schools. I spent a few days looking for a place to stay, and didn't find one, so I went back home.
A few days before I'd walked out of my parents' house, I'd gotten a "Do Not Trespass" notice from the Colchester School District, delivered to my house by the South Burlington Police Department. That notice wasn't the first knowledge that my parents had of the overall situation; sometime before I received the notice, Judy Kearns, the editor of the South Burlington community newspaper called "The Other Paper" had approached my mother and said things such as "Have I ever done anything to you?" My parents had then talked to me and tried to get me to stop documenting what was happening; they weren't successful.
Today I got to the part of that blog page where I wrote about the Faith United Methodist Church, and how I'd received a "Do Not Trespass" notice from the Colchester School District soon after I'd called the pastor of that church and left her a voicemail about how pictures of and stories about South Burlington High School students had been abused in The Other Paper. I'm not sure that the pastor was the one who colluded with the Colchester School District, but I'm also not sure that she isn't. On the same day that I called her, I called some parents of the students who had been featured in the Other Paper in what I felt to be inappropriate ways. I got mostly answering machines, but I did speak for a while with one parent who professed ignorance of the entire situation. I told that parent, and others, to call Colchester High School and talk with the administrators of that high school about the situation. Soon after that, I got the "Do Not Trespass" notice.
At this point, I think it's possible or even likely that there were parents of South Burlington students who did know what was happening in The Other Paper and in The Burlington Free Press, who had heard about me and about my being abused by celebrities, media, corporations, state government and federal government. It seems that perhaps there were and continue to be parents in South Burlington who are in favor of having their children exploited and corrupted.
My other Friendster page, which also has my name on it, discusses the $19 million bribe that Vermont schools got from the federal government in the middle of
September, 2010. All of the money went to pay teachers and administrators.
By then, I had spent a couple of months protesting the White-House-created google blog posts endorsing pedophilia. Many of those blog posts were created to show up on a Google search of the name "Michelle Obama."
On that Friendster page, there are also pictures of a blog post for Michelle Obama from September 16, 2011, the same day that the announcement was made by the Burlington Free Press about the $19 million in federal money being paid out to Vermont teachers and administrators.
The September 16, 2011 blog post for Michelle Obama had a lot on it, including what looked like a bleeding, red letter "A" and two GE Ecoimagination Challenge ads that say "Submit Now" in the center of the ads. The ads are ostensibly meant to elicit ideas from people for the Ecoimagination Challenge, but the ads don't quite say that. What is very prominent is the message "Submit Now." One of the ads is at the top of the blog post, next to a picture of Carla Bruni, the First Lady of France. Ms. Bruni had, prior to that blog post, expressed support for the prisoners in Iran; after that, she changed her mind, and there are pictures documenting that, also, including one showing Ms. Bruni and Mrs. Obama standing together with an ad for "Vermont Cabot Cheddar Cheese" at the top of the blog post. The blog post and the article in it were entitled "Carla Bruni Comes To Michelle Obama's Defense." The article was published September 20, 2011, a few days after I'd put pictures on Friendster of Michelle Obama's website apparently threatening Carla Bruni and the prisoners in Iran. The picture that was chosen by the people who wrote the article is from 2009 and shows Michelle Obama and Carla Bruni standing together, with Mrs. Obama in a dress with red flowers on it. There are subsequent blog posts that show Mrs. Obama in a red dress.
On that Friendster page, there's also a short discussion of GE, the fact that it is a weapons manufacturer, the fact that it did recently own 80% of NBC and still owns 49% of it, and my thoughts about what might have been Hillary Clinton's attempt to block a U.N. treaty on small arms.
I'm fairly certain that the White House has staff watching all activity on my blogs and tracks everything I do online at all times. When I was first wondering about and then doing some online research about the GE-NBC-White House-weapons connection, I did some Google searches on the names of White House staff while I was looking for information online to find out if that connection was a plausible theory. Before I'd even gotten to information that seemed to suggest that it was a plausible theory, I was seeing blog posts on names such as "Joe Biden" that recognized and mocked the direction I was going in; "Cheesburger Pundits and Guns" that kind of thing. There was also one that said something like "Guns make everything less gay!" I wish I'd taken a picture of that one; I can still see it in my mind's eye.
Right now, actually, I just did a Google search on the name "Joe Biden." The recent blog post "Vice President Joe Biden touts race for renewable energy in visit to NREL in Golden." The top of the blog post is an ad for NBC that says "Wheeled Warriors," about the army. There's another ad for NBC along the side of that blog post. It features 4 (I guess they're newscasters?); the one on the far left is a woman in a red dress.
--Renewable energy
I am in favor of renewable energy. However, it's been my guess for a couple of years that all of the science for how to get it to everyone in the world has already been figured out. Perhaps what hasn't been figured out is how to make money off of that renewable energy, which would be a motive for companies that currently sell fossil fuel energy sources not to convert their business to renewable energy sources.
(As I write this, a male resident of the shelter has been sitting a few feet behind me for the past 10 minutes, coughing like there's no tomorrow. It's that very loud, repetitive coughing with the vomiting noise at the end of it that some coughers favor. Now he just got up and walked away; another male resident is walking around the common area, doing the same sort of thing, without the vomiting noise. Some people are bird-watchers and know what different bird-songs sound like. Others, like me....life took us in another direction and we can't all choose our hobbies, now can we?)
Another thing that I think might be keeping renewable energy sources from being implemented all over the world is this; if I'm remembering correctly, all of the oil is going to run out sometime in the next few decades. When that happens, doesn't that mean that for those final decades, the price of everything made with oil is going to go up all the time until there is no oil left?
What if what's happening is that oil companies and those invested in oil company interests want to capitalize on those decades of "The End Of Oil;" that's why they are preventing, rather than promoting, the implementation of renewable energy technology to replace fossil-fuel-based energy technology, worldwide.
Copyright L. Kochman May 23, 2011 @ 5:25 a.m.
sign-off @ 5:54 a.m. I've just spent some time adding things and re-reading some of this page. I'm sure there are typos in it. I need a personal assistant; I'm moderately famous now, aren't I? Aren't I supposed to get one of those?
May 23, 2011
--Food Stamps purchases
My unhappy and indignant assumption is that my food stamps purchases are still being illegally tracked by a lot of people. Most of the time, I have refused to clarify my purchases, because nobody should be invading my privacy that way; however, some situations are so bad that I think I should address them.
Yesterday, I bought a diet Red Raspberry iced tea. It was a warm day and that was what I wanted. It doesn't mean that I've changed my mind about any of the issues.
--Clarification about Iran and other issues
I wrote a note in my blog page from May 21, 2011 about my concerns that one of the reasons that the deaths or continued jailings in Iran are still being pushed by some people is to try to damage my future writing career by putting me under a moral obligation not to work with anyone who showed support for those deaths with ads and clothing color choices and so on.
What I meant was "even if those people change their minds." My impression is that a lot of people who didn't and still don't understand the real, political issues about Iran got involved in promoting those deaths and continued jailings as a joke; a sick, irresponsible joke. That's my feeling about all of the issues I've talked about; at a certain point, you just have to give up on people and their inability or refusal to be responsible.
There's always a lot more going on than I have time to write about. I get harassed in person every day, several times a day, and I do think that it's affecting my mental abilities. Yesterday and the day before were terrible; I had pairs or groups of men harassing me in situations that are supposed to be safe; then they yelled at me when I objected to their behavior, told me that they weren't doing anything wrong, told me I was crazy and that I needed to shut up or leave places where I really had every right to be. They are people who don't let up unless an authority makes them stop. It's always the worst of the worst who do it, and I never provoke it; they are always the ones who start it with their deliberate, harassing comments.
It's not as if I'm reading something that isn't there into casual comments that people make; they will sit or stand near me and have fake conversations about fish and all the other things that have been used as harassment. They know what the larger situation is; maybe some of them read my blog. I don't think that all of the people who do it can be reading my blog, though; I think at least some of them have to be just going by what's in newspapers such as the Times Argus.
The pattern tends to be that they have these fake conversations or make comments, laughing, and then, when I object, they pretend that they have no idea what I'm talking about. Some people do back off, but the past couple of days have been disturbing in how quickly and viciously the men involved ganged up and shouted at me. They seem to be really liking the idea of the United States getting turned into a police state run by men, with women and children subservient to those men.
--South Burlington High School
I just took a look at the website for South Burlington High School. That school is completely overtaken by corrupt administrators; one thing on it is an announcement saying "Congratulations to (the SBHS student) for receiving a "Congressional Choice" Award for his fabulous landscape titled "Seaside Serenity."
There's a picture of the winning art project; it's a picture of water surrounded by rocks.
Obviously, that student created his art project in order to win the contest by making his entire project about sexual harassment of women and the potential executions of the prisoners in Iran. What's worse is that he succeeded; how many other, more worthy projects didn't get any attention?
I just looked up "2011 Congressional Art Exhibition Montpelier VT" and saw on the website for the T.W. Wood Gallery that "winning work (is) to be shown in the National Capitol for a year."
One of my Friendster profiles shows pictures of Patrick Leahy's website from a time after I'd been talking for a few months about pedophilia and other abuses as endorsed by the federal government and enforced with intimidation by the military and the police departments. I thought it was ironic at the time that there was also a main story featured on Senator Leahy's website called "The Fair Sentencing Act Is Signed Into Law" that also has a picture of Senator Leahy shaking hands with President Obama. Now, I think that picture and story are even more ironic.
Here are some of the captions along the side of Senator Leahy's website from that day, starting with October 1, 2010. I think the dates listed in the website must be when the captions first appeared on that website. The first two are:
"Leahy: $31.5 million Army Contract Addition Will Further Extend Goodrich-Vergennes Plant's work on Helicopter Diagnostics Units, October 1, 2010"
"Leahy: 22 VT Police Depts. win bulletproof vest grants, October 1, 2010"
There are more captions, written here in the order in which they appeared on Senator Leahy's website:
"Leahy: 3 Vermont Communities Receive Grants for Police Hiring, September 30, 2010"
"Senate Recesses Without Confirming Judicial Nominees, September 30, 2010"
"Leahy-Authored Bill to Improve Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act Set To Become Law, September 30, 2010"
"Leahy: $200,000 grant will continue key outreach efforts for Vermont's Runaway and Homeless Youth, September 29, 2010"
This morning, I started reading my blog from its first page, entitled "Brian Williams at NBC is a fraud." That blog page originally had a very long section describing the months-long efforts of Brian Williams and other news shows to make daily coverage of the BP oil spill a metaphor for my supposedly hazardously wet and unclean vagina. The NBC Nightly News show used the term "kill the well" a lot, and also on at least one occasion used terms such as "final solution" and "permanent solution" and that was echoed by President Obama in his online video about "killing the well" and finding "a final solution."
I took out most of that section of that blog page in the fall of 2010. The discussion starts again on September 24, 2010, at a time when I'd walked out of my parents' house in the middle of them yelling at me for my efforts to document what had been happening in the newspapers and the schools. I spent a few days looking for a place to stay, and didn't find one, so I went back home.
A few days before I'd walked out of my parents' house, I'd gotten a "Do Not Trespass" notice from the Colchester School District, delivered to my house by the South Burlington Police Department. That notice wasn't the first knowledge that my parents had of the overall situation; sometime before I received the notice, Judy Kearns, the editor of the South Burlington community newspaper called "The Other Paper" had approached my mother and said things such as "Have I ever done anything to you?" My parents had then talked to me and tried to get me to stop documenting what was happening; they weren't successful.
Today I got to the part of that blog page where I wrote about the Faith United Methodist Church, and how I'd received a "Do Not Trespass" notice from the Colchester School District soon after I'd called the pastor of that church and left her a voicemail about how pictures of and stories about South Burlington High School students had been abused in The Other Paper. I'm not sure that the pastor was the one who colluded with the Colchester School District, but I'm also not sure that she isn't. On the same day that I called her, I called some parents of the students who had been featured in the Other Paper in what I felt to be inappropriate ways. I got mostly answering machines, but I did speak for a while with one parent who professed ignorance of the entire situation. I told that parent, and others, to call Colchester High School and talk with the administrators of that high school about the situation. Soon after that, I got the "Do Not Trespass" notice.
At this point, I think it's possible or even likely that there were parents of South Burlington students who did know what was happening in The Other Paper and in The Burlington Free Press, who had heard about me and about my being abused by celebrities, media, corporations, state government and federal government. It seems that perhaps there were and continue to be parents in South Burlington who are in favor of having their children exploited and corrupted.
My other Friendster page, which also has my name on it, discusses the $19 million bribe that Vermont schools got from the federal government in the middle of
September, 2010. All of the money went to pay teachers and administrators.
By then, I had spent a couple of months protesting the White-House-created google blog posts endorsing pedophilia. Many of those blog posts were created to show up on a Google search of the name "Michelle Obama."
On that Friendster page, there are also pictures of a blog post for Michelle Obama from September 16, 2011, the same day that the announcement was made by the Burlington Free Press about the $19 million in federal money being paid out to Vermont teachers and administrators.
The September 16, 2011 blog post for Michelle Obama had a lot on it, including what looked like a bleeding, red letter "A" and two GE Ecoimagination Challenge ads that say "Submit Now" in the center of the ads. The ads are ostensibly meant to elicit ideas from people for the Ecoimagination Challenge, but the ads don't quite say that. What is very prominent is the message "Submit Now." One of the ads is at the top of the blog post, next to a picture of Carla Bruni, the First Lady of France. Ms. Bruni had, prior to that blog post, expressed support for the prisoners in Iran; after that, she changed her mind, and there are pictures documenting that, also, including one showing Ms. Bruni and Mrs. Obama standing together with an ad for "Vermont Cabot Cheddar Cheese" at the top of the blog post. The blog post and the article in it were entitled "Carla Bruni Comes To Michelle Obama's Defense." The article was published September 20, 2011, a few days after I'd put pictures on Friendster of Michelle Obama's website apparently threatening Carla Bruni and the prisoners in Iran. The picture that was chosen by the people who wrote the article is from 2009 and shows Michelle Obama and Carla Bruni standing together, with Mrs. Obama in a dress with red flowers on it. There are subsequent blog posts that show Mrs. Obama in a red dress.
On that Friendster page, there's also a short discussion of GE, the fact that it is a weapons manufacturer, the fact that it did recently own 80% of NBC and still owns 49% of it, and my thoughts about what might have been Hillary Clinton's attempt to block a U.N. treaty on small arms.
I'm fairly certain that the White House has staff watching all activity on my blogs and tracks everything I do online at all times. When I was first wondering about and then doing some online research about the GE-NBC-White House-weapons connection, I did some Google searches on the names of White House staff while I was looking for information online to find out if that connection was a plausible theory. Before I'd even gotten to information that seemed to suggest that it was a plausible theory, I was seeing blog posts on names such as "Joe Biden" that recognized and mocked the direction I was going in; "Cheesburger Pundits and Guns" that kind of thing. There was also one that said something like "Guns make everything less gay!" I wish I'd taken a picture of that one; I can still see it in my mind's eye.
Right now, actually, I just did a Google search on the name "Joe Biden." The recent blog post "Vice President Joe Biden touts race for renewable energy in visit to NREL in Golden." The top of the blog post is an ad for NBC that says "Wheeled Warriors," about the army. There's another ad for NBC along the side of that blog post. It features 4 (I guess they're newscasters?); the one on the far left is a woman in a red dress.
--Renewable energy
I am in favor of renewable energy. However, it's been my guess for a couple of years that all of the science for how to get it to everyone in the world has already been figured out. Perhaps what hasn't been figured out is how to make money off of that renewable energy, which would be a motive for companies that currently sell fossil fuel energy sources not to convert their business to renewable energy sources.
(As I write this, a male resident of the shelter has been sitting a few feet behind me for the past 10 minutes, coughing like there's no tomorrow. It's that very loud, repetitive coughing with the vomiting noise at the end of it that some coughers favor. Now he just got up and walked away; another male resident is walking around the common area, doing the same sort of thing, without the vomiting noise. Some people are bird-watchers and know what different bird-songs sound like. Others, like me....life took us in another direction and we can't all choose our hobbies, now can we?)
Another thing that I think might be keeping renewable energy sources from being implemented all over the world is this; if I'm remembering correctly, all of the oil is going to run out sometime in the next few decades. When that happens, doesn't that mean that for those final decades, the price of everything made with oil is going to go up all the time until there is no oil left?
What if what's happening is that oil companies and those invested in oil company interests want to capitalize on those decades of "The End Of Oil;" that's why they are preventing, rather than promoting, the implementation of renewable energy technology to replace fossil-fuel-based energy technology, worldwide.
Copyright L. Kochman May 23, 2011 @ 5:25 a.m.
sign-off @ 5:54 a.m. I've just spent some time adding things and re-reading some of this page. I'm sure there are typos in it. I need a personal assistant; I'm moderately famous now, aren't I? Aren't I supposed to get one of those?