THERE IS NO CODE INTENDED BY ME ON THIS PAGE. TODAY IS SATURDAY; I HAVE NO INTERNET ACCESS ON SUNDAY, AND ALSO DON'T KNOW HOW MUCH MORE TIME I WILL GET TODAY.
May 7, 2011
--Phoebe Prince and the Boston Globe
Yesterday, in addition to being sexually harassing in a number of ways, the Boston Globe has a story about Phoebe Prince, the high school girl who killed herself, allegedly as a result of bullying by other students. The article begins on page B1, where the title says "Blind eye to bullying over, DA says. Defends modest sentences in Phoebe Prince sucide case." Above the title, there's a quote attributed to "David Sullivan, Northwestern District Attorney." The quote says "They will have this on their backs for the rest of their lives. Worse, they will have it on their conscience."
The article continues and ends on page B3, again under the title "DA defends sentence, says that 'blind eye to bullying' is over."
Below the article about Phoebe Prince on page B3, there's another article whose title says "Aquarium shuts down for a day after glass cracks in giant tank."
It doesn't seem to me that the Boston Globe is interested in ceasing to bully girls and women, or in having anybody else cease to harass, torment and abuse women whether the girls and women end up killing themselves or being killed by others. How anyone can look at something like page B3 of the May 6, 2011 Boston Globe and see anything but pure evil is beyond me.
--More of my getting hassled in person by strangers
Last night, as I was walking by the side of the road, a man drove by me and yelled "PUSSY!" at me from the driver's side window of his car. He was a total stranger to me, but I know that a lot of people in Vermont know who I am even though I don't know them. I was wearing jeans, a sweater, my winter jacket, glasses and my hair in a bun. I couldn't have looked less risque if I'd tried.
A few minutes later, a couple of young men saw me from about 50 feet away. One of them gave a large, fake bout of coughing. Until the person who they were waiting to meet showed up and they all walked past me without doing anything more, I wasn't sure what I could expect from them.
People worked for decades to stop women from being treated in just that way. Why do we now have a President, and a black one at that, who wants to destroy women's civil rights? And why is anyone supporting him in doing so?
--The Times Argus, Friday, May 6, 2011
On the front page of the Friday, May 6, 2011 Times Argus, above the title of the newspaper, it says "State Troopers negotiate pay raise/B1." That's a reference by the Times Argus to the fact that I recently talked on my blog about how the police and armed forces have been used to intimidate people into accepting and promoting abuse of women and children.
The title for the first article on the front page is by "Thatcher Moats." Its title is
"Session winds down
Environmental Enforcement
Public input cut from budget"
If I'm not mistaken, that's the Times Argus trying to insinuate that a lot of people want the abuses to continue and that the will of the general population isn't getting taken into account. First of all, if more people than not wanted the absues to continue, my life would be even more difficult than it is now. Second of all, even if most of the world wanted the abuses to continue, it would be the responsibility of the governments and other powerful entities to refuse to allow the abuses to continue rather than to promote them. A democracy isn't just about givng people what they want; a democracy is also about morality. Democracy is based on moral principles, one of the most important of which is the principle of human rights.
If there were nothing in human nature that sought to dominate and abuse, there wouldn't be any need for political or societal structures in the first place. A peaceful, orderly, fair society would simply occur anywhere that people were; that is not reality.
Below the article entitled "Session winds down," there's a picture of schoolchildren with a title that says "Nesting for Nighthawks."
The caption for the picture says "Middle school students at U-32 build a nighthawk nesting pad on the roof of the school on Thursday afternoon with help from their science teachers and staff from the North Branch Nature Center. Nighthawks like to rest on gravel rooftops but their numbers in Vermont have recently been dwindling. The Nature Center hopes to attract the birds back to the area with nest sites at U-32 and another being built at Crossett Brook School in Duxbury next week."
Below the picture called "Nesting for Nighthawks," there are 3 articles. One is by Jenna Pizzi and says "Plainfield's Red Store to close." The second one says "Entergy closes in on a source of tritium." That one's by Susan Smallheer and begins by saying "Entergy Nuclear says it's getting closer to the source of the third leak of radioactive tritium that has plagued the Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant in the past year." The last article on the page says "Berlin board mulls a dog leash law."
On the front page of the "Local and State" section, B1, there's the article advertised for on A1, "Troopers negotiate pay hike." It begins "Gov. Peter Shumlin on Thursday announced a pay hike for state troopers to remedy the retention issues that have thinned the ranks of the state's largest police force over the past decade."
That article is next to an article entitled "Mudslide!" with a picture of a pile of dirt by the side of a highway. The caption says "A car driving past a huge pile of clay and debris on Route 2 in East Montpelier after a water-logged hillside above the road slid Thursday, covering much of the roadbed with earth."
The article is by Keith Vance. Its smaller title says "No injuries after mass of clay let loose on Route 2."
The pile of dirt in the picture doesn't look much taller than the car that's about to drive past it. The pile of dirt doesn't even look particularly wet.
Below the article about the pile of dirt, there's another article entitled "Shumlin declares state of emergency." It's again by Jenna Pizzi, and it begins:
"Gov. Peter Shumlin declared a state of emergency Thursday, allowing the Vermont National Guard to help in respond (Times Argus grammatical error) to flooding caused by Lake Champlain's record high waters. Shumlin and Maj. General Michael Dubie, the state's National Guard commander, surveyed the damage by helicopter on Thursday afternoon."
The article goes from page B1 to page B2, saying "The governor said there will be five Federal Emergency Management teams in Vermont on Monday to help assess the damage. Shumlin admitted that it would be significantly more than the $3 million estimate he gave earlier this week."
The article about the state troopers' pay raise from page B1 also continues on page B2, right below the article in which Gov. Shumlin explains that he'll be needing more than $3 million from the federal government to deal with flooding. The article about the troopers pay raise continues onto page B2 in the middle of a sentence, saying "'hang unto them," Duffy said."
On the opposite page, B3, the first article says "A busier week for Barre's officers." Page B4 has an ad that takes up 2/3 of the page. It says, in large print "Dine In or Out of Central Vermont." Most of the ad is for a local Italian restaurant, and shows a picture of a pizza. Below that, there are four smaller ads, one that says "Seafood," with the word "Seafood" written in the shape of a fish, another ad for a pizzeria, an ad for a coffee place that says "cornerstone of (2 streets that I won't name) and another small ad for the same Italian restaurant as takes up the rest of the ad, showing its logo which is a picture of a bridge over water.
On the opposite page, the first page of the C, or Sports Section, there's a large picture of a female, high school lacrosse player. Her first and last name are printed in the caption under the picture.
As always, there is far more in the paper than I have time to discuss. I'm including the most prominent indications of a vicious and evil agenda.
I hope that everyone reading here can see that there is nothing in the abuse of me, in the abuse of all women and children, in the exhortations to the death by hanging or stoning or the continued detention of the prisoners in Iran, nothing in all of that abuse that is more than politicians, business and media trying to make money and gain dominance that they don't need and for which there is no moral defense.
--President Obama and the rest of the bullies and abusers
I don't see how a President can demand that people abuse and kill women and rape children. I don't see how a President of this democracy can threaten people's lives and livelihoods for refusing to do those things. I think that maybe President Obama ought to be impeached. He seems to me to be a manipulator, a liar, a conman and a criminal.
As far as the involvement of celebrities and other influential people is concerned; perhaps those people don't realize that most people don't have a buffer against the evil that is now being inflicted upon the world. Most people don't have, can't get, and wouldn't want to have to have bodyguards and houses with extensive security systems. Nobody would go to jail forever for raping and murdering a non-celebrity or the child of a non-celebrity.
What's more, most people don't have large amounts of money to make their lives enjoyable. Most people have to do the best they can, where they are; they can't just take off for another part of the country or another part of the world when their personal stress gets to be too much for them. For most people, their everyday interactions with the people around them are both something that they can't control and an important source of happiness or unhappiness. They can't walk away from those interactions, nor, under ordinary, good conditions, would they want to walk away from them.
Everyone who is involved in the bullying, in the degradation and abuse of women, and in pedophilia, is eroding the fabric of society. What some of the women who have been involved in the things that are degrading to women might not realize is that once women are defined by their gender, they can't get out of it when they want to do so, and neither can the women who have contributed to the degrading definitions, who will find out how quickly and easily the degradation gets turned on them by the people who joined them in degrading others. Even if it's just within your own mind, you will find yourself defining your own behavior by what you do to others; you will have been enslaving yourself the entire time.
None of the degradation is being directed at men; there have been a few jokes about "milk" and things like "bananas," but for the most part, any degradation that's been directed at men has been in the form of derogatory jokes and threats about the fact that those men don't hate women. It's been the equivalent of what used to happen to white people who refrained from abusing black people; they were called "n-----lovers."
--Why pedophilia is wrong
There are a lot of things that children are too young for, and having sex is one of those things. To say that children have sexual feelings is usually true, but that's not saying anything except that children are human beings. Children aren't adults, and there are many adult experiences that they're not ready to have.
In addition to not being physically, emotionally, or in any other way ready for sex, especially with adults, and in addition to being almost always smaller than adults and therefore easily intimidated and forced into things by adults, children don't have the legal rights that adults have. For an adult to have any kind of sexual activity with a child is an abuse of a much less powerful member of society by a much more powerful member of society.
It seems to me that part of the pedophilia as endorsed by the government and other criminal corporate, media and individual factions has involved encouraging parents to have sex with their own children. By law, parents of minor children make decisions for those children and already have a lot of power over them. What's been getting encouraged is nothing less than turning children into sex slaves to their own parents.
Whether it was in talking to people who had been molested or otherwise hypersexualized by others as children, or in reading about the subject, I have never seen anything that suggests that pedophilia and hypersexualization does anything to children except harm them. It harms them immediately, in their childhood, and the effects of it last all their lives.
--The Colchester Sun
While looking through my blog last week, I read a note that I had put my pictures of last fall's Colchester Sun not on my Weebly blog but on a Friendster account. I've now looked at both of my Friendster accounts, which I have because one got suppressed for a while, and I don't see the pictures of the Colchester Sun. I remember that before I was in the hospital, I deleted a lot of pictures from that Friendster account, thinking that there wasn't any reason to keep them there.
However, anyone can go through back, paper issues of the Colchester Sun from last fall and recognize the patterns I've discussed. The pictures I took were from the September 30, 2010 issue of the Colchester Sun.
On my blog page entitled "From October 14, 2010," there is a discussion of and pictures I took of Burlington's supposed community newspaper, "The North Avenue News." That blog page shows just one example of the use of the ECHO/Leahy center ads and it also shows the support of legislators, the Burlington Police Department, school administrators including the superintendent of Burlington schools and the principal of Burlington High School, and some businesses and charities for all of the abuses.
Copyright L. Kochman May 7, 2011 @ 4:47 p.m.
May 7, 2011
--Phoebe Prince and the Boston Globe
Yesterday, in addition to being sexually harassing in a number of ways, the Boston Globe has a story about Phoebe Prince, the high school girl who killed herself, allegedly as a result of bullying by other students. The article begins on page B1, where the title says "Blind eye to bullying over, DA says. Defends modest sentences in Phoebe Prince sucide case." Above the title, there's a quote attributed to "David Sullivan, Northwestern District Attorney." The quote says "They will have this on their backs for the rest of their lives. Worse, they will have it on their conscience."
The article continues and ends on page B3, again under the title "DA defends sentence, says that 'blind eye to bullying' is over."
Below the article about Phoebe Prince on page B3, there's another article whose title says "Aquarium shuts down for a day after glass cracks in giant tank."
It doesn't seem to me that the Boston Globe is interested in ceasing to bully girls and women, or in having anybody else cease to harass, torment and abuse women whether the girls and women end up killing themselves or being killed by others. How anyone can look at something like page B3 of the May 6, 2011 Boston Globe and see anything but pure evil is beyond me.
--More of my getting hassled in person by strangers
Last night, as I was walking by the side of the road, a man drove by me and yelled "PUSSY!" at me from the driver's side window of his car. He was a total stranger to me, but I know that a lot of people in Vermont know who I am even though I don't know them. I was wearing jeans, a sweater, my winter jacket, glasses and my hair in a bun. I couldn't have looked less risque if I'd tried.
A few minutes later, a couple of young men saw me from about 50 feet away. One of them gave a large, fake bout of coughing. Until the person who they were waiting to meet showed up and they all walked past me without doing anything more, I wasn't sure what I could expect from them.
People worked for decades to stop women from being treated in just that way. Why do we now have a President, and a black one at that, who wants to destroy women's civil rights? And why is anyone supporting him in doing so?
--The Times Argus, Friday, May 6, 2011
On the front page of the Friday, May 6, 2011 Times Argus, above the title of the newspaper, it says "State Troopers negotiate pay raise/B1." That's a reference by the Times Argus to the fact that I recently talked on my blog about how the police and armed forces have been used to intimidate people into accepting and promoting abuse of women and children.
The title for the first article on the front page is by "Thatcher Moats." Its title is
"Session winds down
Environmental Enforcement
Public input cut from budget"
If I'm not mistaken, that's the Times Argus trying to insinuate that a lot of people want the abuses to continue and that the will of the general population isn't getting taken into account. First of all, if more people than not wanted the absues to continue, my life would be even more difficult than it is now. Second of all, even if most of the world wanted the abuses to continue, it would be the responsibility of the governments and other powerful entities to refuse to allow the abuses to continue rather than to promote them. A democracy isn't just about givng people what they want; a democracy is also about morality. Democracy is based on moral principles, one of the most important of which is the principle of human rights.
If there were nothing in human nature that sought to dominate and abuse, there wouldn't be any need for political or societal structures in the first place. A peaceful, orderly, fair society would simply occur anywhere that people were; that is not reality.
Below the article entitled "Session winds down," there's a picture of schoolchildren with a title that says "Nesting for Nighthawks."
The caption for the picture says "Middle school students at U-32 build a nighthawk nesting pad on the roof of the school on Thursday afternoon with help from their science teachers and staff from the North Branch Nature Center. Nighthawks like to rest on gravel rooftops but their numbers in Vermont have recently been dwindling. The Nature Center hopes to attract the birds back to the area with nest sites at U-32 and another being built at Crossett Brook School in Duxbury next week."
Below the picture called "Nesting for Nighthawks," there are 3 articles. One is by Jenna Pizzi and says "Plainfield's Red Store to close." The second one says "Entergy closes in on a source of tritium." That one's by Susan Smallheer and begins by saying "Entergy Nuclear says it's getting closer to the source of the third leak of radioactive tritium that has plagued the Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant in the past year." The last article on the page says "Berlin board mulls a dog leash law."
On the front page of the "Local and State" section, B1, there's the article advertised for on A1, "Troopers negotiate pay hike." It begins "Gov. Peter Shumlin on Thursday announced a pay hike for state troopers to remedy the retention issues that have thinned the ranks of the state's largest police force over the past decade."
That article is next to an article entitled "Mudslide!" with a picture of a pile of dirt by the side of a highway. The caption says "A car driving past a huge pile of clay and debris on Route 2 in East Montpelier after a water-logged hillside above the road slid Thursday, covering much of the roadbed with earth."
The article is by Keith Vance. Its smaller title says "No injuries after mass of clay let loose on Route 2."
The pile of dirt in the picture doesn't look much taller than the car that's about to drive past it. The pile of dirt doesn't even look particularly wet.
Below the article about the pile of dirt, there's another article entitled "Shumlin declares state of emergency." It's again by Jenna Pizzi, and it begins:
"Gov. Peter Shumlin declared a state of emergency Thursday, allowing the Vermont National Guard to help in respond (Times Argus grammatical error) to flooding caused by Lake Champlain's record high waters. Shumlin and Maj. General Michael Dubie, the state's National Guard commander, surveyed the damage by helicopter on Thursday afternoon."
The article goes from page B1 to page B2, saying "The governor said there will be five Federal Emergency Management teams in Vermont on Monday to help assess the damage. Shumlin admitted that it would be significantly more than the $3 million estimate he gave earlier this week."
The article about the state troopers' pay raise from page B1 also continues on page B2, right below the article in which Gov. Shumlin explains that he'll be needing more than $3 million from the federal government to deal with flooding. The article about the troopers pay raise continues onto page B2 in the middle of a sentence, saying "'hang unto them," Duffy said."
On the opposite page, B3, the first article says "A busier week for Barre's officers." Page B4 has an ad that takes up 2/3 of the page. It says, in large print "Dine In or Out of Central Vermont." Most of the ad is for a local Italian restaurant, and shows a picture of a pizza. Below that, there are four smaller ads, one that says "Seafood," with the word "Seafood" written in the shape of a fish, another ad for a pizzeria, an ad for a coffee place that says "cornerstone of (2 streets that I won't name) and another small ad for the same Italian restaurant as takes up the rest of the ad, showing its logo which is a picture of a bridge over water.
On the opposite page, the first page of the C, or Sports Section, there's a large picture of a female, high school lacrosse player. Her first and last name are printed in the caption under the picture.
As always, there is far more in the paper than I have time to discuss. I'm including the most prominent indications of a vicious and evil agenda.
I hope that everyone reading here can see that there is nothing in the abuse of me, in the abuse of all women and children, in the exhortations to the death by hanging or stoning or the continued detention of the prisoners in Iran, nothing in all of that abuse that is more than politicians, business and media trying to make money and gain dominance that they don't need and for which there is no moral defense.
--President Obama and the rest of the bullies and abusers
I don't see how a President can demand that people abuse and kill women and rape children. I don't see how a President of this democracy can threaten people's lives and livelihoods for refusing to do those things. I think that maybe President Obama ought to be impeached. He seems to me to be a manipulator, a liar, a conman and a criminal.
As far as the involvement of celebrities and other influential people is concerned; perhaps those people don't realize that most people don't have a buffer against the evil that is now being inflicted upon the world. Most people don't have, can't get, and wouldn't want to have to have bodyguards and houses with extensive security systems. Nobody would go to jail forever for raping and murdering a non-celebrity or the child of a non-celebrity.
What's more, most people don't have large amounts of money to make their lives enjoyable. Most people have to do the best they can, where they are; they can't just take off for another part of the country or another part of the world when their personal stress gets to be too much for them. For most people, their everyday interactions with the people around them are both something that they can't control and an important source of happiness or unhappiness. They can't walk away from those interactions, nor, under ordinary, good conditions, would they want to walk away from them.
Everyone who is involved in the bullying, in the degradation and abuse of women, and in pedophilia, is eroding the fabric of society. What some of the women who have been involved in the things that are degrading to women might not realize is that once women are defined by their gender, they can't get out of it when they want to do so, and neither can the women who have contributed to the degrading definitions, who will find out how quickly and easily the degradation gets turned on them by the people who joined them in degrading others. Even if it's just within your own mind, you will find yourself defining your own behavior by what you do to others; you will have been enslaving yourself the entire time.
None of the degradation is being directed at men; there have been a few jokes about "milk" and things like "bananas," but for the most part, any degradation that's been directed at men has been in the form of derogatory jokes and threats about the fact that those men don't hate women. It's been the equivalent of what used to happen to white people who refrained from abusing black people; they were called "n-----lovers."
--Why pedophilia is wrong
There are a lot of things that children are too young for, and having sex is one of those things. To say that children have sexual feelings is usually true, but that's not saying anything except that children are human beings. Children aren't adults, and there are many adult experiences that they're not ready to have.
In addition to not being physically, emotionally, or in any other way ready for sex, especially with adults, and in addition to being almost always smaller than adults and therefore easily intimidated and forced into things by adults, children don't have the legal rights that adults have. For an adult to have any kind of sexual activity with a child is an abuse of a much less powerful member of society by a much more powerful member of society.
It seems to me that part of the pedophilia as endorsed by the government and other criminal corporate, media and individual factions has involved encouraging parents to have sex with their own children. By law, parents of minor children make decisions for those children and already have a lot of power over them. What's been getting encouraged is nothing less than turning children into sex slaves to their own parents.
Whether it was in talking to people who had been molested or otherwise hypersexualized by others as children, or in reading about the subject, I have never seen anything that suggests that pedophilia and hypersexualization does anything to children except harm them. It harms them immediately, in their childhood, and the effects of it last all their lives.
--The Colchester Sun
While looking through my blog last week, I read a note that I had put my pictures of last fall's Colchester Sun not on my Weebly blog but on a Friendster account. I've now looked at both of my Friendster accounts, which I have because one got suppressed for a while, and I don't see the pictures of the Colchester Sun. I remember that before I was in the hospital, I deleted a lot of pictures from that Friendster account, thinking that there wasn't any reason to keep them there.
However, anyone can go through back, paper issues of the Colchester Sun from last fall and recognize the patterns I've discussed. The pictures I took were from the September 30, 2010 issue of the Colchester Sun.
On my blog page entitled "From October 14, 2010," there is a discussion of and pictures I took of Burlington's supposed community newspaper, "The North Avenue News." That blog page shows just one example of the use of the ECHO/Leahy center ads and it also shows the support of legislators, the Burlington Police Department, school administrators including the superintendent of Burlington schools and the principal of Burlington High School, and some businesses and charities for all of the abuses.
Copyright L. Kochman May 7, 2011 @ 4:47 p.m.