November 14, 2010 @ 8:06 a.m.
Yesterday, I noticed that the Burlington Free Press was, overall, not great but not as bad as it has been at other times. I wanted to wait to see what it would do today before putting up any more pictures of what it has looked like in the past 2 weeks.
Today, the Burlington Free Press has pedohilic references all over it and the The New York Times is joining in with the pedophilia also, in addition to being miserably sexually harassing. I have to think that that's because the entire White House, including White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, was showing support for the pedophilia all day yesterday and throughout most of the night.
Not only that, but the "Boston Globe Special Issue" magazine that has been distributed with the Sunday New York Times today, has a full-page ad on page 19 that says "Celebrating Art. Celebrating The New MFA." There's a portrait of Louis Brandeis on the page; there's a caption next to it that says, in parantheses "Portrait of our co-founder." Then the last 3rd of the page is taken up by a paragraph next to which it says "NUTTER: Nutter, McClennen & Fish LLP Attorneys At Law." 155 Seaport Boulevard, Boston 02210.
Everybody who's part of the harassment knows I'm Jewish, that I have a psychiatric history and, of course, that I'm female; all of those things have been used as slurs about me.
Louis Brandeis was the first Jew ever nominated and appointed to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Brandeis University was founded in his honor; it's a school that has always had a high percentage of Jewish students.
Here's an article about Louis Brandeis from the Internet. I didn't edit any of it; it is as I found it.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jump to content - Jump to section navigation
"Behind every argument is someone's ignorance."
"The most important political office is that of the private citizen."
"We can have democracy in this country, or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both."
Legacy Fund > Justice Louis D. Brandeis Justice Louis D. Brandeis
From The Encyclopedia of World Biography
As an associate justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, Louis Dembitz Brandeis (1856-1941) tried to reconcile the developing powers of modern government and society with the maintenance of individual liberties and opportunities for personal development.
As the United States entered the 20th century, many men became concerned with trying to equip government so as to deal with the excesses and inequities fostered by the industrial development of the 19th century. States passed laws trying to regulate utility rates and insurance manipulations and established minimum-wage and maximum-hour laws. Louis Brandeis was one of the most important Americans involved in this effort, first as a publicly minded lawyer and, after 1916, as a member of the U.S. Supreme Court.
Brandeis was born on November 13, 1856, in Louisville, Kentucky, to Adolph and Fredericka Dembitz Brandeis. His parents were Bohemian Jews who had come to America in the aftermath of those European revolutionary movements of 1848 that had sought to establish liberal political institutions and to strengthen the processes of democracy so as to safeguard the dignity and potential for self-development of the common man.
In 1875, at the age of 18, Brandeis entered the Harvard Law School without a formal college degree; he achieved one of the most outstanding records in its history. At the same time he tutored fellow students in order to earn money (necessary because of his father's loss of fortune in the Panic of 1873). Although Brandeis was not the required age of 21, the Harvard Corporation passed a special resolution granting him a bachelor of law degree in 1877. After a further year of legal study at Harvard, he was admitted to the bar.
Early Legal Career: In 1879 Brandeis began a partnership with his classmate Samuel D. Warren. Together they wrote one of the most famous law articles in history, "The Right to Privacy," published in the December 1890 Harvard Law Review. In it Brandeis enunciated the view he later echoed in the Supreme Court case of Olmstead v. United States (1928), in which he argued that the makers of the Constitution, as evidence of their effort "to protect Americans in their beliefs, their thoughts, their emotions and their sensations ... conferred, as against the Government, the right to be let alone--the most comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized men."
During this stage of his career, Brandeis spent much time helping the Harvard Law School. Though he declined an offer to become an assistant professor, in 1886 he helped found the Harvard Law School Association, an alumni group, and served for many years as its secretary.
Years of Public Service: By 1890 Brandeis had developed a lucrative practice and was able to serve, without pay, in various public causes. When a fight arose, for example, over preservation of the Boston subway system, he helped save it; similarly, he helped lead the opposition to the New Haven Railroad's monopoly of transportation in New England. The Massachusetts State Legislature's adoption of a savings-bank life insurance system was the result of his investigation of the inequities of existing insurance programs.
Brandeis also took part in the effort to bring legal protections to industrial laborers, and as part of this effort he contributed a major concept to Supreme Court litigation. In 1908, defending an Oregon law establishing wages and hours for women laborers, Brandeis introduced what came to be known as the "Brandeis brief," which went far beyond legal precedent to consider the various economic and social factors which led the legislature to pass the law. Many lawyers followed the Brandeis brief and presented relevant scientific evidence and expert opinion dealing with the great social problems of the day mirrored in judicial litigation.
Appointment to the Supreme Court: President Woodrow Wilson offered Brandeis a position in his Cabinet in 1913, but the Boston lawyer preferred to remain simply a counselor to the President. Brandeis continued his investigations of the implications for democracy of the growing concentration of wealth in large corporations. In 1914 he published Other People's Money, and How the Bankers Use It, in which he set down his antimonopoly views.
Wilson's nomination of Brandeis to the Supreme Court on Jan. 28, 1916, aroused a dirty political fight. Six former presidents of the American Bar Association and former president of the United States William Howard Taft denounced Brandeis for his allegedly radical political views. Some anti-Semitism was involved, for Brandeis was the first Jew ever nominated for America's highest court. Finally, however, the fight was won in the Senate, and Brandeis took his seat on June 5, 1916, where he served with distinction until Feb. 13, 1939.
Brandeis often joined his colleague Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. in dissenting against the Court's willingness to pose its judgments about economic and social policy against those of individual states. Also with Holmes, Brandeis bravely defended civil liberties throughout this era. If he did uphold wide use of state powers, it was only in the service of furthering individual self-fulfillment; he also rejected incursions of a state upon a citizen's liberty. Two examples are the Olmstead case (already noted), involving wiretapping, and Whitney v. California, in which Brandeis opposed a California law suppressing free speech.
Personal Interests: Brandeis married Alice Goldmark in 1891, and they had two daughters. Part of his personal life was his commitment to fellow Jews. He became a leading Zionist, supporting the attempt to develop a Jewish nation in Palestine.
Another of Brandeis's great interests was the building up of strong regional schools as a means of strengthening local areas against the threat of national centralization. To this end, beginning in 1924, he helped formulate and develop the law school and general library of the University of Louisville.
Brandeis died on October 5, 1941. His commitments to justice, education, and Judaism were commemorated several years later in the founding of Brandeis University.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
November 14, 2010 @ 9:36 a.m.
The front cover of The New York Times Magazine has the words "Sniff" and "Sniffer" all over it. That's a direct reference to Barack Obama's website from October 30, 2010, in which he mocked victims of rape.
Rape, pedophilia, sexual harassment, threatening people for no reason and murder are not "my" issues; they are moral and societal issues. Also, the fact that every account I have, my e-mail accounts, my blogs, my bank account, my health insurance, have been hacked over the past year is a moral and societal issue. The fact that the U.S. government watches everything I do on the Internet, directly at my computer in my home, is a moral and societal issue. The fact that my blogs have been suppressed or erased more than once; that is a moral and societal issue.
Here's a slideshow of some of the pictures that I took of a blog post that was created for Barack Obama by White House staff on October 30, 2010.
Yesterday, I noticed that the Burlington Free Press was, overall, not great but not as bad as it has been at other times. I wanted to wait to see what it would do today before putting up any more pictures of what it has looked like in the past 2 weeks.
Today, the Burlington Free Press has pedohilic references all over it and the The New York Times is joining in with the pedophilia also, in addition to being miserably sexually harassing. I have to think that that's because the entire White House, including White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, was showing support for the pedophilia all day yesterday and throughout most of the night.
Not only that, but the "Boston Globe Special Issue" magazine that has been distributed with the Sunday New York Times today, has a full-page ad on page 19 that says "Celebrating Art. Celebrating The New MFA." There's a portrait of Louis Brandeis on the page; there's a caption next to it that says, in parantheses "Portrait of our co-founder." Then the last 3rd of the page is taken up by a paragraph next to which it says "NUTTER: Nutter, McClennen & Fish LLP Attorneys At Law." 155 Seaport Boulevard, Boston 02210.
Everybody who's part of the harassment knows I'm Jewish, that I have a psychiatric history and, of course, that I'm female; all of those things have been used as slurs about me.
Louis Brandeis was the first Jew ever nominated and appointed to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Brandeis University was founded in his honor; it's a school that has always had a high percentage of Jewish students.
Here's an article about Louis Brandeis from the Internet. I didn't edit any of it; it is as I found it.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jump to content - Jump to section navigation
- Projects/Events
- Internships
- Scholarships
- Support the Legacy Fund
- Justice Louis D. Brandeis
- Contact Us
- Home
"Behind every argument is someone's ignorance."
"The most important political office is that of the private citizen."
"We can have democracy in this country, or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both."
Legacy Fund > Justice Louis D. Brandeis Justice Louis D. Brandeis
From The Encyclopedia of World Biography
As an associate justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, Louis Dembitz Brandeis (1856-1941) tried to reconcile the developing powers of modern government and society with the maintenance of individual liberties and opportunities for personal development.
As the United States entered the 20th century, many men became concerned with trying to equip government so as to deal with the excesses and inequities fostered by the industrial development of the 19th century. States passed laws trying to regulate utility rates and insurance manipulations and established minimum-wage and maximum-hour laws. Louis Brandeis was one of the most important Americans involved in this effort, first as a publicly minded lawyer and, after 1916, as a member of the U.S. Supreme Court.
Brandeis was born on November 13, 1856, in Louisville, Kentucky, to Adolph and Fredericka Dembitz Brandeis. His parents were Bohemian Jews who had come to America in the aftermath of those European revolutionary movements of 1848 that had sought to establish liberal political institutions and to strengthen the processes of democracy so as to safeguard the dignity and potential for self-development of the common man.
In 1875, at the age of 18, Brandeis entered the Harvard Law School without a formal college degree; he achieved one of the most outstanding records in its history. At the same time he tutored fellow students in order to earn money (necessary because of his father's loss of fortune in the Panic of 1873). Although Brandeis was not the required age of 21, the Harvard Corporation passed a special resolution granting him a bachelor of law degree in 1877. After a further year of legal study at Harvard, he was admitted to the bar.
Early Legal Career: In 1879 Brandeis began a partnership with his classmate Samuel D. Warren. Together they wrote one of the most famous law articles in history, "The Right to Privacy," published in the December 1890 Harvard Law Review. In it Brandeis enunciated the view he later echoed in the Supreme Court case of Olmstead v. United States (1928), in which he argued that the makers of the Constitution, as evidence of their effort "to protect Americans in their beliefs, their thoughts, their emotions and their sensations ... conferred, as against the Government, the right to be let alone--the most comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized men."
During this stage of his career, Brandeis spent much time helping the Harvard Law School. Though he declined an offer to become an assistant professor, in 1886 he helped found the Harvard Law School Association, an alumni group, and served for many years as its secretary.
Years of Public Service: By 1890 Brandeis had developed a lucrative practice and was able to serve, without pay, in various public causes. When a fight arose, for example, over preservation of the Boston subway system, he helped save it; similarly, he helped lead the opposition to the New Haven Railroad's monopoly of transportation in New England. The Massachusetts State Legislature's adoption of a savings-bank life insurance system was the result of his investigation of the inequities of existing insurance programs.
Brandeis also took part in the effort to bring legal protections to industrial laborers, and as part of this effort he contributed a major concept to Supreme Court litigation. In 1908, defending an Oregon law establishing wages and hours for women laborers, Brandeis introduced what came to be known as the "Brandeis brief," which went far beyond legal precedent to consider the various economic and social factors which led the legislature to pass the law. Many lawyers followed the Brandeis brief and presented relevant scientific evidence and expert opinion dealing with the great social problems of the day mirrored in judicial litigation.
Appointment to the Supreme Court: President Woodrow Wilson offered Brandeis a position in his Cabinet in 1913, but the Boston lawyer preferred to remain simply a counselor to the President. Brandeis continued his investigations of the implications for democracy of the growing concentration of wealth in large corporations. In 1914 he published Other People's Money, and How the Bankers Use It, in which he set down his antimonopoly views.
Wilson's nomination of Brandeis to the Supreme Court on Jan. 28, 1916, aroused a dirty political fight. Six former presidents of the American Bar Association and former president of the United States William Howard Taft denounced Brandeis for his allegedly radical political views. Some anti-Semitism was involved, for Brandeis was the first Jew ever nominated for America's highest court. Finally, however, the fight was won in the Senate, and Brandeis took his seat on June 5, 1916, where he served with distinction until Feb. 13, 1939.
Brandeis often joined his colleague Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. in dissenting against the Court's willingness to pose its judgments about economic and social policy against those of individual states. Also with Holmes, Brandeis bravely defended civil liberties throughout this era. If he did uphold wide use of state powers, it was only in the service of furthering individual self-fulfillment; he also rejected incursions of a state upon a citizen's liberty. Two examples are the Olmstead case (already noted), involving wiretapping, and Whitney v. California, in which Brandeis opposed a California law suppressing free speech.
Personal Interests: Brandeis married Alice Goldmark in 1891, and they had two daughters. Part of his personal life was his commitment to fellow Jews. He became a leading Zionist, supporting the attempt to develop a Jewish nation in Palestine.
Another of Brandeis's great interests was the building up of strong regional schools as a means of strengthening local areas against the threat of national centralization. To this end, beginning in 1924, he helped formulate and develop the law school and general library of the University of Louisville.
Brandeis died on October 5, 1941. His commitments to justice, education, and Judaism were commemorated several years later in the founding of Brandeis University.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
November 14, 2010 @ 9:36 a.m.
The front cover of The New York Times Magazine has the words "Sniff" and "Sniffer" all over it. That's a direct reference to Barack Obama's website from October 30, 2010, in which he mocked victims of rape.
Rape, pedophilia, sexual harassment, threatening people for no reason and murder are not "my" issues; they are moral and societal issues. Also, the fact that every account I have, my e-mail accounts, my blogs, my bank account, my health insurance, have been hacked over the past year is a moral and societal issue. The fact that the U.S. government watches everything I do on the Internet, directly at my computer in my home, is a moral and societal issue. The fact that my blogs have been suppressed or erased more than once; that is a moral and societal issue.
Here's a slideshow of some of the pictures that I took of a blog post that was created for Barack Obama by White House staff on October 30, 2010.
November 14, 2010 @ 9:54 a.m.
It seems to me that the Democratic Party in Vermont needed every penny of the $19 million bribe that the federal government gave to Vermont school teachers and administrators for "emergency aid for education jobs" in September, 2010 for the Democratic candidate for governor Peter Shumlin to win. He won by less than 5,000 votes.
The $19 million bribe was announced in the Burlington Free Press on September 16, 2010. The evening of September 16, 2010 was when Michelle Obama had a blog post on Google for her name that had her threatening Carla Bruni with the GE "Ecoimagination Challenge" ad in two different places on the website that said "Submit Now!"
Barack and Michelle Obama started the pedophilia side of the issue this past summer, with blog posts on Barack Obama's name saying "Sasha and Malia are growing up in a fish bowl," and other kinds of things, and with Michelle Obama's blog posts getting more and more inappropriate every day. The Obamas showed support for people in Vermont who deliberately exploited their children with pictures in the Burlington Free Press; I would report on one of my blogs about what was going on and then Michelle Obama would put or allow to be put captions along the side of her blog posts including the person's first name, praising whoever it was at the time. At least one person got hired at the Burlington Free Press after she used her own kids by putting them in the paper with some of the insinuations and put harassing references on her Facebook profile.
That blog got destroyed; I might still have a copy of some of what I wrote over this past summer, but I think that what's happening now should make it obvious that this is a serious issue, initiated and perpetuated by President Obama and his wife for reasons which still totally escape my comprehension.
It seems to me that the implications of what this President has devoted himself to for the past several months ought to be obvious to anyone who is watching the situation, and I am at a daily loss as to understand how anyone who claims to be a rational, decent person can support it or enjoy it.
In addtion to "Last Man Standing Before A Urinal" in Barack Obama's October 30, 2010 blog post in which he mocked victims of rape, some of the other captions were:
--"Cracker Squire"-- the word "Cracker" is a slur against white people
--"Crazy for Liberty"-- the President mocking my wish to be free of his harassment and also making anothe slur about my psychiatric history
--"Fresh Loaf/Creative Loafing"--more slurs about my vagina, insinuating that it smells
--"Redstate.com"--more support for the execution of the people in Iran
--"Swampland/Time Magazine"--more slurs by another harassing, American magazine
I do think it's telling that the "comment" in the "comment" section just below the second of 2 comments in a row that say "Last Man Standing Before a Urinal" says "Sick of Republicans." I've always thought that all of the comments in those comment sections for all of the blog posts were probably created and posted on those websites by the same White House staff who created the blog posts in the first place. That means that whoever created this website on behalf of Barack Obama mocking victims of rape and comparing them to the urinals in front of which only brave men might dare to stand also wrote the comment "Sick of Republicans" 3 days before Republicans won all over the country.
It's true that there were Republicans in Vermont who started to copy the Democrats' campaign tactics of sexual harassment, threats of violence and death and pedophilia; however, everybody who knew what was going on here knew that the Democrats in the White House had started those campaign tactics and that the Democratic White House was pushing the Democratic Party in Vermont to use those tactics, all the way through the election.
I saw this website of Barack Obama's on October 30, 2010, and I took pictures of it then, but I decided to wait until after the November 2, 2010 election to publish the pictures on my blog. I didn't want President Obama's behavior to cost the Democrats in Vermont any more than he already had.
My initial discussion of Barack Obama's October 30, 2010 website in which he mocked rape victims is on 2 of my blog pages on Weebly: the page entitled "From November 3, 2010 @ 11:16 p.m." and the page entitled "From November 4, 2010." There are 2 separate slide shows showing that October 30, 2010 website; one is almost at the end of the blog page entitled "From November 3, 2010 @ 11:16 p.m.," and the other is at the beginning of the next blog page, entitled "From November 4, 2010."
Here's something that I wrote about bullying and suicide on my blog page "From November 4, 2010." I put it after the second slideshow detailing President Obama's October 30, 2010 website:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The 11/03-11/10/10 issue of the free, Vermont newspaper Seven Days has an article about suicides of college students that have happened in the past month in Vermont. The administration at UVM is denying that the deaths occurred as a result of bullying or harassment. According to the Seven Days article, “16 other campus suicides ....have occurred nationally in recent weeks that resulted from bullying and harassment.”
It's too bad that Seven Days is still part of the harassment as of this week, but at least the newspaper gave the information.
I know that every time I have been to UVM in the past 2 months, students have shown in either positive or negative ways that they know who I am. It seems to me that the Obama administration's behavior is having 2 effects; one is to encourage people who want to bully and harass people to do so but who wouldn't do it if they didn't think it was becoming an accepted and even praised part of life because of what's been going on, and the other effect is to terrorize people who see what I'm going through and/or who are being bullied and harassed because bullying, harassment, sexual exploitation and sexual violence have been getting authorized not only by the government but by political candidates, corporations, media both big and small, and famous people who have been respected and liked worldwide for decades."
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
November 14, 2010 @ 11:22 a.m.
If President Obama isn't racist, then why was there a caption on his October 30, 2010 blog post that said "Cracker Squire"?
If he's not completely insensitve to issues faced by people who have psychiatric histories, and if he's not also completely self-congratulatory about his oppressiveness, then why did the caption just below "Cracker Squire" say "Crazy for Liberty"?
If President Obama isn't a vicious misogynist, why was that blog post created, in which he mocks victims of rape with an ad that says "Sniff Out up to 30% Savings Around Your Home" next to a story about a brutal rape? Why were there comments written by his own staff that started off by saying "Last Man Standing Before a Urinal?"
Why were there captions saying "Fresh Loaf/Creative Loafing" and "Swampland/Time Magazine"?
If President Obama doesn't want the prisoners in Iran to die, why was there a caption along the side of that same blog post that said "Redstate.com" just above the caption that said "Swampland/Time Magazine?"
If President Obama isn't completely in denial about the effects that his actions have been having on the country and on his own party, the Democratic Party, then why was this blog post created for him 3 days before Republicans won all across the United States?
If you go to the blog posts that have my first discussion of that blog post and you look at the pictures, you'll see a giant pumpkin at the end of President Obama's website that says "Experience the Boo!" and you'll also see that the original article used for the blog post is credited to "Cox Media." There might be people reading this blog post for whom English is a 2nd language and who might not know that the word "Cox" is pronounced the same as the word "cocks," which is the plural form of a very dirty word, "cock," which means "penis."
It seems to me that the Democratic Party in Vermont needed every penny of the $19 million bribe that the federal government gave to Vermont school teachers and administrators for "emergency aid for education jobs" in September, 2010 for the Democratic candidate for governor Peter Shumlin to win. He won by less than 5,000 votes.
The $19 million bribe was announced in the Burlington Free Press on September 16, 2010. The evening of September 16, 2010 was when Michelle Obama had a blog post on Google for her name that had her threatening Carla Bruni with the GE "Ecoimagination Challenge" ad in two different places on the website that said "Submit Now!"
Barack and Michelle Obama started the pedophilia side of the issue this past summer, with blog posts on Barack Obama's name saying "Sasha and Malia are growing up in a fish bowl," and other kinds of things, and with Michelle Obama's blog posts getting more and more inappropriate every day. The Obamas showed support for people in Vermont who deliberately exploited their children with pictures in the Burlington Free Press; I would report on one of my blogs about what was going on and then Michelle Obama would put or allow to be put captions along the side of her blog posts including the person's first name, praising whoever it was at the time. At least one person got hired at the Burlington Free Press after she used her own kids by putting them in the paper with some of the insinuations and put harassing references on her Facebook profile.
That blog got destroyed; I might still have a copy of some of what I wrote over this past summer, but I think that what's happening now should make it obvious that this is a serious issue, initiated and perpetuated by President Obama and his wife for reasons which still totally escape my comprehension.
It seems to me that the implications of what this President has devoted himself to for the past several months ought to be obvious to anyone who is watching the situation, and I am at a daily loss as to understand how anyone who claims to be a rational, decent person can support it or enjoy it.
In addtion to "Last Man Standing Before A Urinal" in Barack Obama's October 30, 2010 blog post in which he mocked victims of rape, some of the other captions were:
--"Cracker Squire"-- the word "Cracker" is a slur against white people
--"Crazy for Liberty"-- the President mocking my wish to be free of his harassment and also making anothe slur about my psychiatric history
--"Fresh Loaf/Creative Loafing"--more slurs about my vagina, insinuating that it smells
--"Redstate.com"--more support for the execution of the people in Iran
--"Swampland/Time Magazine"--more slurs by another harassing, American magazine
I do think it's telling that the "comment" in the "comment" section just below the second of 2 comments in a row that say "Last Man Standing Before a Urinal" says "Sick of Republicans." I've always thought that all of the comments in those comment sections for all of the blog posts were probably created and posted on those websites by the same White House staff who created the blog posts in the first place. That means that whoever created this website on behalf of Barack Obama mocking victims of rape and comparing them to the urinals in front of which only brave men might dare to stand also wrote the comment "Sick of Republicans" 3 days before Republicans won all over the country.
It's true that there were Republicans in Vermont who started to copy the Democrats' campaign tactics of sexual harassment, threats of violence and death and pedophilia; however, everybody who knew what was going on here knew that the Democrats in the White House had started those campaign tactics and that the Democratic White House was pushing the Democratic Party in Vermont to use those tactics, all the way through the election.
I saw this website of Barack Obama's on October 30, 2010, and I took pictures of it then, but I decided to wait until after the November 2, 2010 election to publish the pictures on my blog. I didn't want President Obama's behavior to cost the Democrats in Vermont any more than he already had.
My initial discussion of Barack Obama's October 30, 2010 website in which he mocked rape victims is on 2 of my blog pages on Weebly: the page entitled "From November 3, 2010 @ 11:16 p.m." and the page entitled "From November 4, 2010." There are 2 separate slide shows showing that October 30, 2010 website; one is almost at the end of the blog page entitled "From November 3, 2010 @ 11:16 p.m.," and the other is at the beginning of the next blog page, entitled "From November 4, 2010."
Here's something that I wrote about bullying and suicide on my blog page "From November 4, 2010." I put it after the second slideshow detailing President Obama's October 30, 2010 website:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The 11/03-11/10/10 issue of the free, Vermont newspaper Seven Days has an article about suicides of college students that have happened in the past month in Vermont. The administration at UVM is denying that the deaths occurred as a result of bullying or harassment. According to the Seven Days article, “16 other campus suicides ....have occurred nationally in recent weeks that resulted from bullying and harassment.”
It's too bad that Seven Days is still part of the harassment as of this week, but at least the newspaper gave the information.
I know that every time I have been to UVM in the past 2 months, students have shown in either positive or negative ways that they know who I am. It seems to me that the Obama administration's behavior is having 2 effects; one is to encourage people who want to bully and harass people to do so but who wouldn't do it if they didn't think it was becoming an accepted and even praised part of life because of what's been going on, and the other effect is to terrorize people who see what I'm going through and/or who are being bullied and harassed because bullying, harassment, sexual exploitation and sexual violence have been getting authorized not only by the government but by political candidates, corporations, media both big and small, and famous people who have been respected and liked worldwide for decades."
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
November 14, 2010 @ 11:22 a.m.
If President Obama isn't racist, then why was there a caption on his October 30, 2010 blog post that said "Cracker Squire"?
If he's not completely insensitve to issues faced by people who have psychiatric histories, and if he's not also completely self-congratulatory about his oppressiveness, then why did the caption just below "Cracker Squire" say "Crazy for Liberty"?
If President Obama isn't a vicious misogynist, why was that blog post created, in which he mocks victims of rape with an ad that says "Sniff Out up to 30% Savings Around Your Home" next to a story about a brutal rape? Why were there comments written by his own staff that started off by saying "Last Man Standing Before a Urinal?"
Why were there captions saying "Fresh Loaf/Creative Loafing" and "Swampland/Time Magazine"?
If President Obama doesn't want the prisoners in Iran to die, why was there a caption along the side of that same blog post that said "Redstate.com" just above the caption that said "Swampland/Time Magazine?"
If President Obama isn't completely in denial about the effects that his actions have been having on the country and on his own party, the Democratic Party, then why was this blog post created for him 3 days before Republicans won all across the United States?
If you go to the blog posts that have my first discussion of that blog post and you look at the pictures, you'll see a giant pumpkin at the end of President Obama's website that says "Experience the Boo!" and you'll also see that the original article used for the blog post is credited to "Cox Media." There might be people reading this blog post for whom English is a 2nd language and who might not know that the word "Cox" is pronounced the same as the word "cocks," which is the plural form of a very dirty word, "cock," which means "penis."
Front cover of the Sunday New York Times Magazine, November 14, 2010
More of the Sunday New York Times Magazine, November 14, 2010
November 14, 2010 @ 3:43 p.m.
Right now, there are only 4 pictures in the slideshow just above. When I was here earlier today, I kept getting messages from Weebly saying "Your request can't be processed," and then my Internet connection got cut over and over again.
That happens all the time. Sometimes it happens in the middle of the night when I've already been working on things here, and I just let it go for the night because I can't get anything done.
I'm going to put a new slideshow next to keep going with pictures from today's Sunday New York Times Magazine; that way, there's a record also of the fact that my Internet connection kept getting disrupted while I was here before.
By the way; the main headline on the front page of the Burlingon Free Press today says "Squeezed Out;" it's a story about hunting, and it's below three pictures of high school football teams and another title at the top of the page that says "Efficient lighting to make a difference in Burlington schools." At the bottom of the page, the ad for Northfield Savins Bank that says "FLYING PIG TALES" is back, with its logo of a pig with wings. That's all the Burlington Free Press's celebration of what happened yesterday with the White House giving support to everything that's been going on, and to Brian Williams at NBC and his "Making A Difference" fraud and harassment. The biggest headline on the front page of the Sports section says "TAKING OVER," and the front page of the "Vermont" section shows a picture of a 3rd and 4th grade classroom below a headline that says "Chittenden East mergers: IS NOW THE TIME?" with another subtitle that says "If idea advances, school voters may have say in May." All of that means that James Fogler at the Burlington Free Press hopes that pedophilia will become legal, that a law will be passed to make it mandatory in all schools.
Under the story with the caption "If idea advances school voters may have say in May," it says "In Winooski, runners help stock Little Green Pantry food shelf," and "Environmentals look ahead with optimism; Gov.-elect Shumlin addresses conference." Much of the paper has environmental issues used in harassing ways; that's standard for the Burlington Free Press now.
USA Weekend, also owned by Gannett, is full of harassing references, and I noticed that Republican Sarah Palin appeared in it, in a picture with her kids on a dock surrounded by water.
Sometimes I can't tell if the people who become involved in the harassment do it because they are in denial about the effects that it's having and will continue to have or if they do it because they think I'm exaggerating everything that's going on and that nothing that I say is going to happen is going to happen. It's not your Free Speech right to endanger people, to threaten them for no reason, to encourage pedophilia, to encourage rape and other kinds of sexual exploitation, to encourage murder. I'm not fabricating what's going on; either the government and other harassers don't want to believe that they're having as huge of a negative impact on people's lives as they are, or they really want all of those crimes to become an accepted, praised part of life in the United States and around the world.
Right now, there are only 4 pictures in the slideshow just above. When I was here earlier today, I kept getting messages from Weebly saying "Your request can't be processed," and then my Internet connection got cut over and over again.
That happens all the time. Sometimes it happens in the middle of the night when I've already been working on things here, and I just let it go for the night because I can't get anything done.
I'm going to put a new slideshow next to keep going with pictures from today's Sunday New York Times Magazine; that way, there's a record also of the fact that my Internet connection kept getting disrupted while I was here before.
By the way; the main headline on the front page of the Burlingon Free Press today says "Squeezed Out;" it's a story about hunting, and it's below three pictures of high school football teams and another title at the top of the page that says "Efficient lighting to make a difference in Burlington schools." At the bottom of the page, the ad for Northfield Savins Bank that says "FLYING PIG TALES" is back, with its logo of a pig with wings. That's all the Burlington Free Press's celebration of what happened yesterday with the White House giving support to everything that's been going on, and to Brian Williams at NBC and his "Making A Difference" fraud and harassment. The biggest headline on the front page of the Sports section says "TAKING OVER," and the front page of the "Vermont" section shows a picture of a 3rd and 4th grade classroom below a headline that says "Chittenden East mergers: IS NOW THE TIME?" with another subtitle that says "If idea advances, school voters may have say in May." All of that means that James Fogler at the Burlington Free Press hopes that pedophilia will become legal, that a law will be passed to make it mandatory in all schools.
Under the story with the caption "If idea advances school voters may have say in May," it says "In Winooski, runners help stock Little Green Pantry food shelf," and "Environmentals look ahead with optimism; Gov.-elect Shumlin addresses conference." Much of the paper has environmental issues used in harassing ways; that's standard for the Burlington Free Press now.
USA Weekend, also owned by Gannett, is full of harassing references, and I noticed that Republican Sarah Palin appeared in it, in a picture with her kids on a dock surrounded by water.
Sometimes I can't tell if the people who become involved in the harassment do it because they are in denial about the effects that it's having and will continue to have or if they do it because they think I'm exaggerating everything that's going on and that nothing that I say is going to happen is going to happen. It's not your Free Speech right to endanger people, to threaten them for no reason, to encourage pedophilia, to encourage rape and other kinds of sexual exploitation, to encourage murder. I'm not fabricating what's going on; either the government and other harassers don't want to believe that they're having as huge of a negative impact on people's lives as they are, or they really want all of those crimes to become an accepted, praised part of life in the United States and around the world.
Continuation of pictures of the Sunday New York Times Magazine, November 14, 2010 at 4:08 p.m., after my Internet connection has stopped being repeatedly disrupted at least for the time being.
The last ad is directed at Democratic U.S. Senator Patrick Leahy from Vermont, who has been a major endorser of the pedophilia and all forms of the harassment in Vermont. The reference is to the ECHO/Lake Aquariaum and Science Center/Leahy Center for Lake Champlain. On November 10, 2010, the Hometown section of the Burlington Free Press put another ad for the Leahy Center that said "Power Play" on page 13Y. The caption for the whole page said "a peek inside." There were two pictures of children, one a 4-year-old boy with his father and the other a little girl. The Power Play ad, in addition to what it usually has said in the middle of it which is "Conservation Quest; Become an energy SUPER HERO: Sponsored by Efficiency Vermont, City Market, NBC News Channel 5, The Burlington Free Press," also had an extra section attached to the top of the ad that said "Thursday November 11 6:30 P.M. -8:30 P.M.: THE FOOD LESS TRAVELED: A special event to benefit the Vermont Foodbank: Area chefs compete to create the most delicious dish that has traveled the least amount of food miles in a create and delicious evening with proceeds to benefit the Vermont Foodbank and ECHO's educational programs. $12.00) The attachment proclaiming "THE FOOD LESS TRAVELED" was right below the picture of the little girl in a green sweatshirt. She and the little boy in the other picture were both at an event at Hinesburg Community School.
It's been for several weeks that I have written on my blog about how the ECHO/Lake Aquarium and Science Center/Leahy Center for Lake Champlain "Power Play, Conservation Quest" ad has been used by the Burlington Free Press and other harassing media to prove that not only U.S. Senator Leahy but also the local and state government in Vermont are in support of all of what's been happening, including pedophilia. Senator Leahy has been a dedicated supporter of all of it; there is no question that he is still encouraging that "Power Play" ad in all of its forms to be used in any way that the harassing media in Vermont would like to use it, and now he's been rewarded for his efforts by The New York Times.
The top of the ad in the New York Times says "Stay Warm And In Touch." This entire situation is nothing less than War on Women, Children, and Everything That Is Decent and Worthwhile.
I've just renamed the blog page where I talked about the "Hometown" section from 11/10/10 and also had started to put up pictures from the "Hometown" section from 11/03/10 to say ""Hometown" section of the Burlington Free Press 11/03/10 and 11/10/10." It was originally called "Election Day," but I did write that blog page on 11/10/10 and on that page I went through the Hometown section from 11/10/10 page by page and described what was on it, including that ECHO/Leahy Center ad that insinuated that a little girl and a 4-year-old boy are appropriately called "THE FOOD LESS TRAVELED."
It's VERY time-consuming to take pictures of what the pedophilic newspapers in Burlington do; not only did the Burlington Free Press go back to packing its newspaper with harassing references and with pedophilia on every page of the Hometown section as soon as the November 2, 2010 election was over, when Weebly starts putting messages on the screen saying "We could not process your last request," when my computer completely freezes, when my Internet connection gets cut over and over again, then it's even more difficult and time-consuming. That's in addition to how much I hate going through the paper to look at all of what's there; I HATE looking at it. It's incredibly awful; the pedophilia is painful for me to look at and deal with, and it makes so angry that whenever I spend time on it I am constantly keeping myself from going online or making a phone call and talking about how angry it makes me.
It is much faster for me to go through and write about what's in the newspaper than to take pictures of it, so when I just don't have time or cannot emotionally deal with cutting and putting the little scraps of paper over all of the faces, all of the first and last names while leaving the ages visible, and then taking pictures of one depressing, sickening, infuriating page after another, I write about it first and hope both that I will be able to deal with creating slideshows later and that the Internet and my blog work long enough for me to accomplish something while I'm trying to publish the pictures.
If there are people who are wondering why I get as angry as I do, with 100 TV shows and everything else constantly working against everything that I try to do while you act like it doesn't matter and that I'm exaggerating and that it's all just so funny and lucrative and I'm such a jerk as far as you're concerned, that's why; that's why I get as angry as I do.
It's been for several weeks that I have written on my blog about how the ECHO/Lake Aquarium and Science Center/Leahy Center for Lake Champlain "Power Play, Conservation Quest" ad has been used by the Burlington Free Press and other harassing media to prove that not only U.S. Senator Leahy but also the local and state government in Vermont are in support of all of what's been happening, including pedophilia. Senator Leahy has been a dedicated supporter of all of it; there is no question that he is still encouraging that "Power Play" ad in all of its forms to be used in any way that the harassing media in Vermont would like to use it, and now he's been rewarded for his efforts by The New York Times.
The top of the ad in the New York Times says "Stay Warm And In Touch." This entire situation is nothing less than War on Women, Children, and Everything That Is Decent and Worthwhile.
I've just renamed the blog page where I talked about the "Hometown" section from 11/10/10 and also had started to put up pictures from the "Hometown" section from 11/03/10 to say ""Hometown" section of the Burlington Free Press 11/03/10 and 11/10/10." It was originally called "Election Day," but I did write that blog page on 11/10/10 and on that page I went through the Hometown section from 11/10/10 page by page and described what was on it, including that ECHO/Leahy Center ad that insinuated that a little girl and a 4-year-old boy are appropriately called "THE FOOD LESS TRAVELED."
It's VERY time-consuming to take pictures of what the pedophilic newspapers in Burlington do; not only did the Burlington Free Press go back to packing its newspaper with harassing references and with pedophilia on every page of the Hometown section as soon as the November 2, 2010 election was over, when Weebly starts putting messages on the screen saying "We could not process your last request," when my computer completely freezes, when my Internet connection gets cut over and over again, then it's even more difficult and time-consuming. That's in addition to how much I hate going through the paper to look at all of what's there; I HATE looking at it. It's incredibly awful; the pedophilia is painful for me to look at and deal with, and it makes so angry that whenever I spend time on it I am constantly keeping myself from going online or making a phone call and talking about how angry it makes me.
It is much faster for me to go through and write about what's in the newspaper than to take pictures of it, so when I just don't have time or cannot emotionally deal with cutting and putting the little scraps of paper over all of the faces, all of the first and last names while leaving the ages visible, and then taking pictures of one depressing, sickening, infuriating page after another, I write about it first and hope both that I will be able to deal with creating slideshows later and that the Internet and my blog work long enough for me to accomplish something while I'm trying to publish the pictures.
If there are people who are wondering why I get as angry as I do, with 100 TV shows and everything else constantly working against everything that I try to do while you act like it doesn't matter and that I'm exaggerating and that it's all just so funny and lucrative and I'm such a jerk as far as you're concerned, that's why; that's why I get as angry as I do.
Here is the page slandering Louis Brandeis from the "The Boston Globe Special Issue" that was delivered along with the Sunday New York Times today:
November 14, 2010 @ 8:15 p.m.
The whole thing is a slander by Nutter, McClennan & Fish of "155 Seaport Boulevard, Boston" against Brandeis and Warren, the original founders of their firm. The firm of "Nutter" has no respect for anything that its original founders stood for; it looks as if they're counsel to all of the kinds of businesses and people against whom Brandeis tried to protect the rights of individuals. The firm of "Nutter" has no self-respect, either, and probably is suffering from a decreasing level of competence all the time. If you are really good at something, you don't need to become part of a fad or part of something discriminatory and dangerous that hurts other people for no reason, and you also don't need to find powerful people to try to crowd around and get favors from by helping them pursue their corrupt and ineffective agenda.
The whole thing is a slander by Nutter, McClennan & Fish of "155 Seaport Boulevard, Boston" against Brandeis and Warren, the original founders of their firm. The firm of "Nutter" has no respect for anything that its original founders stood for; it looks as if they're counsel to all of the kinds of businesses and people against whom Brandeis tried to protect the rights of individuals. The firm of "Nutter" has no self-respect, either, and probably is suffering from a decreasing level of competence all the time. If you are really good at something, you don't need to become part of a fad or part of something discriminatory and dangerous that hurts other people for no reason, and you also don't need to find powerful people to try to crowd around and get favors from by helping them pursue their corrupt and ineffective agenda.
Front Cover of the "Special Issue" of the Boston Globe
November 14, 2010 @ 8:34 p.m.
There's the little girl on the front page, then "Local History COMES ALIVE," "A taste of the Americas," and "Details are the Difference." For anyone whose first language isn't English, "to come" is also used to mean "to orgasm," and that's what the Boston Globe put next to the picture of the little girl. I'm sure the rest of it is obvious, and I am still at a loss to explain the appeal that Brian Williams and his idea-stealing, fraud over "Making A Difference" and his bigoted, petty and repulsive harassment have for people.
I'm sure that there was more that was bigoted and disgusting in that "Special Edition" of the Boston Globe, but I didn't spend extra time on it. I'm sure it's obvious what happened and the way that the White House's actions all the way around affected the media yesterday.
Is there anyone out there who is still not taking those blog posts of the White House seriously? They're not fun or cute; they are deadly serious. The Internet is the fastest form of communication that there is right now; if the Internet is light-speed, everything else is done at a pace that is somewhere between walking and driving in a residential neighborhood.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Front Page of the Sunday New York Times, November 14, 2010, in which the New York Times mocks the release of a woman from house arrest by putting a headline for a supposedly unrelated story under a picture of her. The headline says "Reading Earth's Future in Glacial Ice: Rising Seas Predicted as Threat to Coastal Areas."
November 14, 2010 @ 8:46 p.m.
It has been standard practice for the most aggressive of the harassers to insinuate that the people who those harassers are threatening are dangerous threats themselves instead of undeserving scapegoats; that's been a major theme of the harassment from the beginning. The use of the BP oil spill as a metaphor was definitely that way; the NBC Nightly News run by Brian Williams, along with all other harassers at NBC and in other media were chanting "Kill the well! Put a lid on it! Clean it up!" for months without interruption; there are still BP oil spill references and jokes among various harassing individuals and entities every day.
People saying something about you doesn't make it true. In fact, if you feel the need to exhort other people to "Get In The Game!" to help you slander someone, it probably means that nothing that you want to say about that person is true or fair.
I am very tired and if I return to the Internet tonight, I don't know that it should be for more of this same thing. If I feel like I can handle writing about more of it, I will, but otherwise it will have to wait and people who don't see pictures of what I've discussed right away will have to take my word for it. I'm doing my best.
Copyright L. Kochman November 14, 2010
It has been standard practice for the most aggressive of the harassers to insinuate that the people who those harassers are threatening are dangerous threats themselves instead of undeserving scapegoats; that's been a major theme of the harassment from the beginning. The use of the BP oil spill as a metaphor was definitely that way; the NBC Nightly News run by Brian Williams, along with all other harassers at NBC and in other media were chanting "Kill the well! Put a lid on it! Clean it up!" for months without interruption; there are still BP oil spill references and jokes among various harassing individuals and entities every day.
People saying something about you doesn't make it true. In fact, if you feel the need to exhort other people to "Get In The Game!" to help you slander someone, it probably means that nothing that you want to say about that person is true or fair.
I am very tired and if I return to the Internet tonight, I don't know that it should be for more of this same thing. If I feel like I can handle writing about more of it, I will, but otherwise it will have to wait and people who don't see pictures of what I've discussed right away will have to take my word for it. I'm doing my best.
Copyright L. Kochman November 14, 2010